2015
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514258112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is CRISPR-based gene drive a biocontrol silver bullet or global conservation threat?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
177
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
177
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CRISPR method was first demonstrated for double-stranded DNA in 2013 [59], and is more efficient and less expensive than previously proposed gene drive technologies [60], but we were unaware of its potential at the time of the 2014 horizon scan. The potential conservation risks and opportunities associated with using CRISPR for biological control have been thoroughly discussed [59,60] and, to the best of our knowledge, it has not yet been used as the basis for an actual species control program. However, such use of CRISPR might be considered as a candidate horizon issue, especially if implementation was likely to be extensive and occurred in the absence of a regulatory framework [60].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CRISPR method was first demonstrated for double-stranded DNA in 2013 [59], and is more efficient and less expensive than previously proposed gene drive technologies [60], but we were unaware of its potential at the time of the 2014 horizon scan. The potential conservation risks and opportunities associated with using CRISPR for biological control have been thoroughly discussed [59,60] and, to the best of our knowledge, it has not yet been used as the basis for an actual species control program. However, such use of CRISPR might be considered as a candidate horizon issue, especially if implementation was likely to be extensive and occurred in the absence of a regulatory framework [60].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential conservation risks and opportunities associated with using CRISPR for biological control have been thoroughly discussed [59,60] and, to the best of our knowledge, it has not yet been used as the basis for an actual species control program. However, such use of CRISPR might be considered as a candidate horizon issue, especially if implementation was likely to be extensive and occurred in the absence of a regulatory framework [60].Four of the issues highlighted this year (creating fuel from bionic leaves, reverse photosynthesis for biofuel production, manipulating coral symbionts to avoid mass coral bleaching, and extensive use of bacteria and fungi to manage agricultural pests and diseases) are products of the rapidly growing field of biotechnology. It has been suggested that the world is at the cusp…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date most attention has been on restoration (Daehler and Goergen 2005;Tjelmeland et al 2008;Brooks et al 2010); however, beyond localised asset protection, it remains unrealistic for extensive and remote conservation lands, and may also not in itself lead to the stable recovery of ecosystems (Reid et al 2009). In these cases, disturbance management, biocontrol and possibly the application of new genetic approaches such as CRISPR-based gene drive technology (Webber et al 2015) offer the greatest hope. There will also be circumstances where the economic, social or environmental cost of interventions is so great as to be impractical or undesirable, in which case the invaded environment becomes the 'new normal'.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given the invasive nature of D. suzukii, additional measures should be taken to ensure containment of the drive and eradication of the species only in the non-native range. For example, both human-assisted and natural movement must be considered (Webber, Raghu, and Edwards 2015).…”
Section: The New World Screwworm: a Devastating Obligate Parasite Of mentioning
confidence: 99%