2013
DOI: 10.1080/1600910x.2013.860611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the research medium the message? On the performativity of media within social research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A volume edited by Wiedmann et al (2020) focuses on the troubles and frictions of working with concepts in STS research practice. STS has been deeply interested in the performativity of media, 'novel' digital devices as well as dominant method devices employed by social scientists (Law et al, 2011;Liegl and Wagner, 2013), recognising the role of materiality and human as well as non-human agency.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A volume edited by Wiedmann et al (2020) focuses on the troubles and frictions of working with concepts in STS research practice. STS has been deeply interested in the performativity of media, 'novel' digital devices as well as dominant method devices employed by social scientists (Law et al, 2011;Liegl and Wagner, 2013), recognising the role of materiality and human as well as non-human agency.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, epistemic practices also rely on technical instruments, spatial architectures, and material arrangements that are taken for granted and therefore are ignored in research reports and publications (e. g., Knorr Cetina 1981; Latour 1987; Latour and Woolgar 1986). While the focus of STS was initially limited to the natural sciences, more recent research has begun to investigate the social sciences (Law 2004; Law and Urry 2004) including qualitative and ethnographic methods (Engert and Krey 2013; Kalthoff 2013; Liegl and Wagner 2013; Schindler and Schäfer 2020; Tutt and Hindmarsh 2011). In applying insights from STS, these studies have offered analyses of the materiality of ethnographic knowledge production, focusing particularly on fieldnotes and on writing practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%