Is the toxic potential of nanosilver dependent on its size?

Abstract

BackgroundNanosilver is one of the most commonly used engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). In our study we focused on assessing the size-dependence of the toxicity of nanosilver (Ag ENMs), utilising materials of three sizes (50, 80 and 200 nm) synthesized by the same method, with the same chemical composition, charge and coating.MethodsUptake and localisation (by Transmission Electron Microscopy), cell proliferation (Relative growth activity) and cytotoxic effects (Plating efficiency), inflammatory response (induction of IL-8 and MCP-1 by Enzyme linked immune sorbent assay), DNA damage (strand breaks and oxidised DNA lesions by the Comet assay) were all assessed in human lung carcinoma epithelial cells (A549), and the mutagenic potential of ENMs (Mammalian hprt gene mutation test) was assessed in V79-4 cells as per the OECD protocol. Detailed physico-chemical characterization of the ENMs was performed in water and in biological media as a prerequisite to assessment of their impacts on cells. To study the relationship between the surface area of the ENMs and the number of ENMs with the biological response observed, Ag ENMs concentrations were recalculated from μg/cm2 to ENMs cm2/cm2 and ENMs/cm2.ResultsStudied Ag ENMs are cytotoxic and cytostatic, and induced strand breaks, DNA oxidation, inflammation and gene mutations. Results expressed in mass unit [μg/cm2] suggested that the toxicity of Ag ENMs is size dependent with 50 nm being most toxic. However, re-calculation of Ag ENMs concentrations from mass unit to surface area and number of ENMs per cm2 highlighted that 200 nm Ag ENMs, are the most toxic. Results from hprt gene mutation assay showed that Ag ENMs 200 nm are the most mutagenic irrespective of the concentration unit expressed.ConclusionWe found that the toxicity of Ag ENMs is not always size dependent. Strong cytotoxic and genotoxic effects were observed in cells exposed to Ag ENMs 50 nm, but Ag ENMs 200 nm had the most mutagenic potential. Additionally, we showed that expression of concentrations of ENMs in mass units is not representative. Number of ENMs or surface area of ENMs (per cm2) seem more precise units with which to compare the toxicity of different ENMs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12989-014-0065-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Silver nanoparticles activate endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling pathway in cell and mouse models: The role in toxicity evaluation

“…It was reported that expression of concentrations of nanomaterials in mass units is not representative. Number or surface area of nanoparticles (per cm 2 ) seem more precise units with which to compare the toxicity of different nanomaterials [33]. The 1.3 mg/cm 2 dose of AgNPs is equal to AgNP 161 cm 2 /cm 2 of effective surface area (Calculated based on Table S1).…”

Complex poly(lactic acid)-based biomaterial for urinary catheters: II. Biocompatibility

“…Therefore, through the melt processing procedure at the concentration level used, the samples are non-cytotoxic and are suitable for medical uses, although in the literature in some cases a toxic effect of silver NPs was demonstrated. Strong cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of pure silver NPs were found depending on their size, 59 and it was established that small silver NPs (10 nm) are cytotoxic to human lung cells and that the toxicity observed is associated with the rate of intracellular silver release, a 'Trojan horse' effect. 60 However Hackenberg et al 61 found that the cyto-and genotoxic potentials of silver NPs appear at significantly higher concentrations compared with the antimicrobial effective levels at which they are employed in present study, in which a good balance was maintained between antibacterial activity and cytocompatibility as the presented results demonstrate and also in accordance with other researches.…”

Immunotoxicity, genotoxicity and epigenetic toxicity of nanomaterials: New strategies for toxicity testing?

“…Mutations are assessed at a specific locus -often the HPRT (hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase) or TK (thymidine kinase) genes (Wang et al, 2007;Huk et al, 2014Huk et al, , 2015Gabelova et al, 2017). These assays can detect a range of mutations, including deletions; however, the mouse lymphoma assay (based on the TK gene) detects deletions with higher efficiency compared with the HPRT gene mutation test (Johnson, 2012).…”

“…These assays can detect a range of mutations, including deletions; however, the mouse lymphoma assay (based on the TK gene) detects deletions with higher efficiency compared with the HPRT gene mutation test (Johnson, 2012). HPRT is a purine salvage enzyme, which phosphorylates 'waste' purines and adds them to the cellular DNA precursor nucleotide pool Huk et al, 2014). The HPRT gene is X-linked, with only one active copy per cell, so that a mutation in only one allele is needed for phenotypic expression.…”