2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)63945-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there a relationship between workplace and patient safety?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with value driven units' influence on development of a safety culture (Kalish and Aebersold, 2006). Safety embraces physical, psychological and social aspects for all staff, patients and users (Firth-Cozens, 2001;Groah and Butler, 2006). This is reflected in a commitment to reduce adverse events for patients (Bhatia et al, 2003); fostering prevention (Schneider et al, 2003); disclosure of errors (Clark, 2002;Hart and Hazelgrove, 2001); as well as the encouragement of error reporting and looking for the unexpected (Kalish and Aebersold, 2006); promotion of a safety culture for all (Hewison, 1999;Clark, 2002); with the identification and management of risk (Cox et al, 2006) is considered part of the job (Scalzi et al, 2006).…”
Section: Open Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with value driven units' influence on development of a safety culture (Kalish and Aebersold, 2006). Safety embraces physical, psychological and social aspects for all staff, patients and users (Firth-Cozens, 2001;Groah and Butler, 2006). This is reflected in a commitment to reduce adverse events for patients (Bhatia et al, 2003); fostering prevention (Schneider et al, 2003); disclosure of errors (Clark, 2002;Hart and Hazelgrove, 2001); as well as the encouragement of error reporting and looking for the unexpected (Kalish and Aebersold, 2006); promotion of a safety culture for all (Hewison, 1999;Clark, 2002); with the identification and management of risk (Cox et al, 2006) is considered part of the job (Scalzi et al, 2006).…”
Section: Open Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%