ISBT Working Party on Terminology for Red Cell Surface
Antigens: Munich Report

Lewis, M.; Jr., F.H. Allen; Anstee, D.J.; Bird, G.W.G.; Brodheim, E.; Contreras, M.; Crookston, M.; Dahr, W.; Engelfriet, C.P.; Giles, C.M.; Issitt, Peter D.; Jørgensen, J.; Kornstad, L.; Leikola, J.; Lubenko, A.; Marsh, W.L.; Moore, B.P.L.; Morel, P.; Moulds, J.J.; Nevanlinna, H.; Nordhagen, R.; Rosenfield, R.E.; Sabo, B.; Salmon, Ch.; Seidl, S.; Tippett, P.A.; Walker, R.H.; Yasuda, J.

doi:10.1159/000466367

Cited by 9 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For populations other than whites, 2,3 studies have been restricted to testing with anti‐Do a and, thus, the numbers given for Do(a–b+) in Table 1 are calculated from the prevalence given for the Do a antigen 3 . Do a and Do b were placed in the Dombrock blood group system (DO; 014) by the ISBT Working Party on Terminology for Red Cell Surface Antigens in 1985 6 …”

Section: The Dombrock Blood Group Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The high‐prevalence antigen Jo a was first described in 1972 12 and later shown to have a phenotypic association with Gy a and Hy antigens because RBCs with either the Gy(a–) phenotype or the Hy– phenotype are also Jo(a–) 13,14 . Jo a was assigned a number in the ISBT series of high‐incidence antigens before its association with Gy a and Hy was realized 6 . The Jo a antigen was shown to reside on the Gregory glycoprotein by immunoblotting 15 but it was never placed in the Gregory collection.…”

Section: The Dombrock Blood Group Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Dombrock blood group system: a review

Reid¹

2003

Transfusion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: The Dombrock Blood Group Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Dombrock Blood Group Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Dombrock blood group system: a review

Reid¹

2003

Transfusion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Since then, TRANSFUSION has been, and still is, one of the leading journals to publish articles about blood groups. It is interesting that the concept that a blood group system consisted of genetically discrete, but phenotypically linked, antigens was not documented until two decades later when the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Terminology for Red Cell Surface Antigens published their first two reports categorizing blood groups into systems and collections 1,2 . About the same time, study of the biochemical bases of blood groups started to reveal the function of components carrying them.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Blood groups: the past 50 years

Daniels

Reid

2010

Transfusion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the first issue of TRANSFUSION in 1961, there has been a tremendous expansion in not only the number of blood group antigens identified but also in our knowledge of their biochemical basis, function, and more recently, associated DNA changes. As certain techniques became available, our ability to discover and elucidate blood group antigens and appreciate their contribution to biology became possible. In particular, Western blotting, monoclonal antibodies, cloning, and polymerase chain reaction-based assays have led to an explosion of our knowledge base. The study of blood groups has had a significant effect on human genetics where they serve as useful markers in genetic linkage analyses. Indeed blood groups have provided several "firsts" in certain aspects of genetics. Blood group-null phenotypes, as natural human knockouts, have provided valuable insights into the importance of red blood cell membrane components. This review summarizes key aspects of the discovery of blood groups; the inconsistent terminology that has arisen; and the contribution of blood groups to genetics, safe transfusion, transplantation, evolution, and biology.

show abstract

“…The number of antigens accomodated in Collections, the 700 Series of Low‐Incidence Antigens, or the 901 Series of High‐Incidence Antigens continues to deminish, which is in keeping with them being ‘holding tank’ categories as predicted by the original working party [6,7]. The number of antigens, and this year even the number of systems, recognized by the ISBT has increased.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

ISBT Scientific Series – State of the Art Invited speakerProtein blood group systems: Berlin and beyond

Reid

2012

ISBT Science Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As of July 2010, 24 of the 30 blood group systems recognized by the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) are protein‐based. These proteins are oriented within the red cell membrane as single pass membrane proteins, multi‐pass proteins, glycosylphosphatidylinositol‐linked proteins, or adsorbed from the plasma. At the 2010 meeting of the ISBT working party on the red cell immunogenetics and blood group terminology, 14 ‘new’ high‐incidence blood group antigens were ratified into 10 of the systems, one antigen was made obsolete, and a new collection was established. Early in 2012, two new protein‐based blood group systems were established. Both are members of the ATP‐binding cassette family of proteins.

show abstract

ISBT Working Party on Terminology for Red Cell Surface Antigens: Munich Report

Cited by 9 publications

References 1 publication

The Dombrock blood group system: a review

The Dombrock blood group system: a review

Blood groups: the past 50 years

ISBT Scientific Series – State of the Art Invited speakerProtein blood group systems: Berlin and beyond

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About