2023
DOI: 10.25077/jpi.25.1.98-109.2023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolasi dan Identifikasi Bakteri Gram Positif Staphylococcus aureus dan Micrococcus pada Peternakan Sapi yang Terindikasi Mastitis

Abstract: Mastitis menjadi salah satu penyakit yang menyebabkan penurunan produksi ternak dan sulit disembuhkan dengan menggunakan antibiotik dan dapat menimbulkan residu, serta memicu resistensi antibiotik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bakteri Gram positif yang dapat menjadi penyebab mastitis pada sapi. Penelitian menggunakan sampel yang diambil dari peternakan rakyat dengan cara swab ambing ternak. Isolasi bakteri dilakukan dengan cara penanaman pada media Mannitol Salt Agar (MSA) dan melakukan Identifika… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The practicality test was analyzed based on student responses using student response questionnaires. Student responses are students' responses to the media they developed (Ayuti et al, 2023;Rahayu & Setiadi, 2023;Siregar et al, 2014). According to previous study a positive response is obtained if the response questionnaire category shows a value of more than 61%, so the media is said to be practical if used in learning (Anisa & Mitarlis, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practicality test was analyzed based on student responses using student response questionnaires. Student responses are students' responses to the media they developed (Ayuti et al, 2023;Rahayu & Setiadi, 2023;Siregar et al, 2014). According to previous study a positive response is obtained if the response questionnaire category shows a value of more than 61%, so the media is said to be practical if used in learning (Anisa & Mitarlis, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%