2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.9b00117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isothermal Vapor–Liquid Equilibrium of the Absorption Working Pairs (HFC-32 + DMETrEG, HFC-32 + NMP) at Temperatures from 293.15 to 343.15 K

Abstract: The working pairs of HFCs + organic absorption solvents are commonly used in absorption systems. In this work, the vapor–liquid equilibrium (VLE) data of HFC-32 + DMETrEG at (293.15–343.15) K and HFC-32 + NMP at (323.15–343.15) K were measured in a dual cycle apparatus. The VLE data were correlated by Antione-type equation, NRTL, and PR + MHV1 + NRTL model, respectively. The predicted VLE data showed a good agreement with the experimental VLE data. NRTL model was recommended to predict the VLE data and charact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of uncertainty was similar to our previous researches. , Considering the error from PT25 (0.001 K), the error from Agilent (0.005 K), and fluctuations of bath temperature (0.01 K), the expanded uncertainty of temperature ( k = 2) was 0.03 K. Considering the error from pressure sensors (1.4 kPa), error from Agilent (0.002 kPa), and the repeatability error (2.0 kPa) at equilibrium, the expanded uncertainty of pressure ( k = 2) was 4.9 kPa.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis of uncertainty was similar to our previous researches. , Considering the error from PT25 (0.001 K), the error from Agilent (0.005 K), and fluctuations of bath temperature (0.01 K), the expanded uncertainty of temperature ( k = 2) was 0.03 K. Considering the error from pressure sensors (1.4 kPa), error from Agilent (0.002 kPa), and the repeatability error (2.0 kPa) at equilibrium, the expanded uncertainty of pressure ( k = 2) was 4.9 kPa.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The experimental apparatus, shown in Figure , was a recirculation system, which was similar to that in our published work . Compared to the previous apparatus, the vapor pump was removed, and the vapor sampling section was added for measuring the vapor composition by gas chromatography (GC) through the six-way valve.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the uncertainty of temperature, pressure, and composition needed to be analyzed. The detailed processes of uncertainty analysis (temperature and pressure) were shown in our previous work. , The expanded uncertainty of temperature ( k = 2) was U ( T ) = 0.074 K. The expanded uncertainty of pressure ( k = 2) was U ( p ) = 2.0 kPa. For the calculation of composition uncertainty, the uncertainty of the peak area ratio during the experiment could be calculated according to the experimental data using the Bessel formula.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysis Of Measured Parametersmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The detailed processes of uncertainty analysis (temperature and pressure) were shown in our previous work. 20,21 The expanded uncertainty of temperature (k = 2) was U(T) = 0.074 K. The expanded uncertainty of pressure (k = 2) was U(p) = 2.0 kPa. For the calculation of composition uncertainty, the uncertainty of the peak area ratio ( )…”
Section: ■ Experimental Section ■ Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%