1991
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4804(91)90100-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jejunal and ileal absorptive function after a model of canine jejunoileal autotransplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluated responses to exogenously applied neuropeptides and to EFS to explore indirectly any changes of receptor expression, signaling pathways, or endogenous release of VIP and substance P by EFS which might contribute to enteric motor dysfunction after SBT. 1,[4][5][6] Exogenous VIP evoked a dose-dependent, profound inhibition of contractile activity, which was not affected by SBT and was not blocked by either the VIP antagonist, inhibition of NO production, or the combination of both. In contrast, the procontractile effect of exogenous substance P was diminished in animals 1 year after SBT and was blocked efficiently by the substance P antagonist in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We evaluated responses to exogenously applied neuropeptides and to EFS to explore indirectly any changes of receptor expression, signaling pathways, or endogenous release of VIP and substance P by EFS which might contribute to enteric motor dysfunction after SBT. 1,[4][5][6] Exogenous VIP evoked a dose-dependent, profound inhibition of contractile activity, which was not affected by SBT and was not blocked by either the VIP antagonist, inhibition of NO production, or the combination of both. In contrast, the procontractile effect of exogenous substance P was diminished in animals 1 year after SBT and was blocked efficiently by the substance P antagonist in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Our hypothesis was that the obligate extrinsic denervation mandated by SBT leads to changes in the enteric neurotransmission mediated by these specific neurotransmitters. By using different models of denervation and evaluating the response to both exogenously applied neuropeptides and EFS, our goal was to explore indirectly any alterations in receptor expression or downstream mechanisms as well as changes in endogenous release of these neurotransmitters (by EFS), which might contribute to the enteric dysfunction after SBT [1,[3][4][5]. We showed that abdominal operations caused a previously unrecognized, reversible increase in VIP sensitivity 1 wk postoperatively, but neither disruption of enteric myoneuronal continuity (by intestinal transection) nor SBT altered VIP sensitivity after 8 wk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although outcomes after SBT have improved markedly over the last decade, due mainly to technical improvements and use of new immunosuppressants [1], many challenges in the postoperative management of these patients remain, one of which is enteric dysfunction with high stomal output or diarrhea [1,3,4]. Because diarrhea occurs in dog models of autotransplantation of the small bowel in which no immunosuppressants are used and immune phenomena are avoided, other factors such as the obligate extrinsic denervation by SBT are believed to contribute to the development of enteric dysfunction after SBT [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…55 Experimental evidence also indicates that the chronic extrinsic denervation of the small intestine does not affect net intestinal absorption of water and electrolytes. [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] We have also shown that CGx does not affect Na ϩ intake in rats fed 2% NaCl. 68 The exact hemodynamic mechanism by which CGx affects Ang II salt hypertension is still not completely clear and needs to be investigated further by chronic instrumentation of rats for measurements of cardiac output and total peripheral resistance determination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%