1998 IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems. Surfing the Waves of Science and Technology (Cat. No.9
DOI: 10.1109/icecs.1998.813338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jitter effects in continuous-time ΣΔ modulators with delayed return-to-zero feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main disadvantage of CT Σ∆ modulator is its sensitivity to the clock jitter of the feedback Digital-toAnalog Converter (DAC) which is not shaped with the loop filter due to its direct connection to the input node. This clock jitter noise appears as a white noise in the signal band and can limit the modulator performance [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantage of CT Σ∆ modulator is its sensitivity to the clock jitter of the feedback Digital-toAnalog Converter (DAC) which is not shaped with the loop filter due to its direct connection to the input node. This clock jitter noise appears as a white noise in the signal band and can limit the modulator performance [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. The performance of a ΔΣ modulator with an RZ DAC is sensitive to DAC pulse width jitter [14]. For more than a 95 dB DR, the DAC pulse width jitter requirement is about 78 ps RMS , which is calculated from a 100 dB DR.…”
Section: Dac Pulse Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulse-delay jitter does not affect the amount of feedback charge by the active pulse, but rather only changes the frequency response of the modulator loop filter, therefore is not significant either [10,12]. However, pulse-width jitter directly changes the amount of feedback charge from the active pulse, and the error charge is not noise-shaped and directly fed back to the input, which seriously degrades the performance of CTDSM [6,8,9]. Therefore, reducing or eliminating the effects of pulse-width jitter is most important to improve the performance of CTDSM in the presence of clock jitter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its standard deviation is denoted as σ CLK J in this paper. Clock jitter effects in CTDSM have been well studied in literature [6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. In CTDSM, clock jitter affects the ideal modulator operation in three ways, which is illustrated in Figure 1, considering the general case of a return-to-zero feedback.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation