2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-com.2016.1339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint channel estimation and detection using Markov chain Monte Carlo method over sparse underwater acoustic channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These approaches can compensate a constant Doppler shift (see Case in Section 4). Other approaches for constant Doppler shift compensation (not all necessarily in the context of underwater communications) have been proposed by Sharif et al, Li et al, Kim et al, Ming et al, Huang et al, Amar et al, Jing et al, Li et al, Lu et al, Zhang et al, Yu et al, Hou et al, and Huang et al In our modem design (Sections 3 and 4), we address variable Doppler shifts, which can be linear and nonlinear. We have addressed the linear case in a previous work .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches can compensate a constant Doppler shift (see Case in Section 4). Other approaches for constant Doppler shift compensation (not all necessarily in the context of underwater communications) have been proposed by Sharif et al, Li et al, Kim et al, Ming et al, Huang et al, Amar et al, Jing et al, Li et al, Lu et al, Zhang et al, Yu et al, Hou et al, and Huang et al In our modem design (Sections 3 and 4), we address variable Doppler shifts, which can be linear and nonlinear. We have addressed the linear case in a previous work .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the multi‐scale case, the estimation methods should include a repeated waveform rebuilt process. The parameters of each path are determined by the LS or highest degree of correlation between the reproduced waveform and the received signal [10–12]. Then, the received signal updates itself by eliminating the estimated path components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the dynamic propagation phenomena such as scattering from rough surfaces will cause diffuse multipath patterns, which can be properly modeled by a block sparse channel instead of a purely sparse one, the block-orthogonal matching pursuit (BOMP) algorithm has been proposed to address this type of dynamic sparsity. 23,24 As the Delay-Doppler spread function is capable of converting the time varying sparse structure at time domain into a more stable Delay-Doppler representation, 25 channel estimation approaches based on the Delay-Doppler spread function are attractive for estimating rapidly time varying channels. Previous investigations that addressed the optimization of Delay-Doppler channel model with OMP algorithm 25 or basis expansion models 26 have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, by converting the estimation of time varying UWA channel into a DCS problem, the dynamic compressed sensing algorithm is designed for the UWA channel that simultaneously exhibits large delay spread and fast time variations. Second, based on numerical simulations, we provide performance comparisons among the OMP, smoothed l0 estimation (SL0), 12,13 BOMP, 23,24 linear Kalman estimation (Kalman), 31 Least Square QR-factorization (LSQR) 19 algorithm, as well as the proposed KF-CS algorithm. Furthermore, field data obtained from a physical shallow water channel is adopted to assess the impacts of different channel estimation algorithms on the UWA communication performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%