1994
DOI: 10.1109/78.340779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint DOA estimation and phase calibration of linear equispaced (LES) arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the array uncalibration and the receiver carrier phase offsets. A method to remove it consists in averaging (in space) the antenna signals as proposed in [3] under the assumption that the receiver phases are independent with zero mean so that M/2 i=1Φ (i) = 0. This is a reasonable approach if the number of sensors is large.…”
Section: A Impairment Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is due to the array uncalibration and the receiver carrier phase offsets. A method to remove it consists in averaging (in space) the antenna signals as proposed in [3] under the assumption that the receiver phases are independent with zero mean so that M/2 i=1Φ (i) = 0. This is a reasonable approach if the number of sensors is large.…”
Section: A Impairment Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the estimator can be severely affected by the presence of hardware impairments. Some of these impairments have been considered in the literature among which the array uncalibration that causes a phase ambiguity [3]- [4], the imperfect knowledge of the array position [5], the mutual coupling of the array elements [6]. However, there are also other impairments that need to be taken into account as the presence of offsets among the emitter and the receiver carrier frequency, and the presence of a DC bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The autocalibration methods jointly estimate the parameters of DOAs and sensor gain‐phase errors. The methods in , designed for non‐uniform linear array (ULA) with certain conditions , estimate these parameters based on the eigenstructure of (modified) array covariance, where the iterative methods apply to small array perturbations, and the non‐iterative methods apply to a small number of incident signals regardless of the degree of array perturbations. The methods specially designed for ULA or uniform rectangular array (URA) do not need iteration and are capable of handling large perturbations (there is an unidentifiable rotation factor for estimating sensor phase errors and DOAs (see for a ULA case and for a URA case).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on smoothed array data, all the high-resolution algorithms can be directly used to solve the DOA estimation problem. For sensor gain-phase uncertainties, there are two categories, the precalibration methods [12,13] [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. The precalibration methods commonly use auxiliary sources (ASs) with known DOAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5]- [6] ,some procedures is developed for unifor linear array(ULA) that calibrates the array by estimating the sensor gain and phase perturbations.The DOA estimation is then based on the estimated perturbations.Although those methods ,especially as [6], are effective to calibrate gain and phase error for ULA,are not suitable for other arrays such as uniform circular array ,nonunifor linear array and so on. Based on the Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%