2020
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2020.3039565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Features Extraction for Multiple Moving Targets Using (Ultra-)Wideband FMCW Signals in the Presence of Doppler Ambiguity

Abstract: This article addresses the joint estimation of range, velocity and azimuth for multiple fast-moving targets using (ultra-)wideband (UWB) frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar with a phased array in the presence of Doppler ambiguities. The range migration of moving targets is described with the coupling of the fast-time and slow-time (chirp index), leading to the smearing of the target Doppler spectrum. This phenomenon degrades the performance of conventional detection and estimation techniques. As w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, DBF is not a high-resolution angle-finding method. Higher angular resolution can be achieved with Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) [6], subspace-based methods, such as multiple signal classification (MUSIC) and estimation of signal parameters via rational invariance techniques (ESPRIT) [7], sparse sensing-based methods [8], using the movement of radar [9], and the iterative adaptive approach (IAA) [10]. Those are proposed to break the Rayleigh limits under current configuration by signal processing or information theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, DBF is not a high-resolution angle-finding method. Higher angular resolution can be achieved with Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) [6], subspace-based methods, such as multiple signal classification (MUSIC) and estimation of signal parameters via rational invariance techniques (ESPRIT) [7], sparse sensing-based methods [8], using the movement of radar [9], and the iterative adaptive approach (IAA) [10]. Those are proposed to break the Rayleigh limits under current configuration by signal processing or information theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last few decades, more and more low-observable high-speed and manoeuvering targets have emerged in the radar field of view. There is a growing need for the high precision motion information of the manoeuvering target, since it is very meaningful for the target detection, tracking, imaging, classification, and identification [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. It is well known that the coherent or non-coherent integration is a powerful approach to improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of radar returns, which is extremely helpful for the estimation of the target's motion parameters [1].…”
Section: Introduction 1| Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for a high-speed target moving with sufficient manoeuverability, the energy of echo signal would spread in different range cells, and the Doppler spectrum of echo signal may be ambiguous, spreading, split, skew, and wrapping during the observation time interval, for a radar system adopting the low-pulse repetition frequency (PRF) scheme to increase the range unambiguous observation scope. Direct integration of the echo signal among multiple pulses cannot efficiently exploit the echo signal energy, the performance of a traditional radar system would be seriously deteriorated [4,5,9,10,[12][13][14][15]. In the case of multiple targets, the situation is more challenging.…”
Section: Introduction 1| Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work in [35] uses the residual motion compensation to improve the SAR image quality for automotive. The velocity information was also used for wideband DOA estimation with compensation of range migration and the presence of Doppler ambiguity in [36] and for high angular resolution imaging in [37] and [38].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all the aforementioned algorithms [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38] do not consider the ambiguity problem in case of the forward-looking radar. To our best knowledge, compared with [21] and [24], this article is the first to solve the ambiguity in DBS for forward-looking MIMO radar.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%