Proceedings of the 2018 Morning Workshop on Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Network 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3229625.3229630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Rate and FoV adaptation in immersive video streaming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of solely relying on viewport and bandwidth data for quality adjustments, Nguyen et al [58] proposed to select the viewport bitrate by also taking into account the viewport prediction errors during each segment duration. He et al [59] performed a network delay-based joint selection of the viewport coverage and bitrate. The simulation outcomes confirm that adaptable viewport coverage offers improved quality streaming under different delay settings.…”
Section: B Tile-based Adaptive Streamingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of solely relying on viewport and bandwidth data for quality adjustments, Nguyen et al [58] proposed to select the viewport bitrate by also taking into account the viewport prediction errors during each segment duration. He et al [59] performed a network delay-based joint selection of the viewport coverage and bitrate. The simulation outcomes confirm that adaptable viewport coverage offers improved quality streaming under different delay settings.…”
Section: B Tile-based Adaptive Streamingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works use prediction mechanism to perform rate adaption for network distribution. For instance, He et al [12] propose a joint rate and FoV adaptation that varies the anticipation window based upon the network response.…”
Section: A User Behavior Analysis For Immersive Videosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He et al (He et al, 2018) looked at the joint adaptation of the field of view with the rate under variations of the network delay and the congestion. They proposed an algorithm to adapt the size of the field of view to be downloaded based upon the network and buffering delay to retrieve and view the stream segment so that it encompasses with high likelihood the user's viewport at the time of rendering.…”
Section: Viewport-dependent Streamingmentioning
confidence: 99%