“…Graphene represents an alternative to CNTs with a low convective heat transfer coefficient, thereby enabling exceptional electrothermal device performance . Still, because graphene-based heaters suffer from large sheet resistance, they require a reasonably high input voltage (20–60 V) to attain operational temperatures (50–250 °C). ,− Methods that attempt to overcome this issue include sequential transfer-and-stacking of multiple graphene sheets, lattice doping, mixing with metallic nanoparticles, and fabricating graphene–CNT hybrid structures. ,,,,− Overall, these approaches involve process steps that hinder a lean and cost-effective workflow for future technology deployment. In addition to graphene sheets, resistive heating elements have been successfully made from graphene derivatives such as graphene oxide (GO), reduced graphene oxide (rGO), and laser-induced rGO (LrGO). − Although these materials have the advantage of low production costs and simple process workflows, they suffer from batch-to-batch heterogeneity, , high density of atomic lattice defects, ,,,, and poor electrical conductivity. , More importantly, graphene derivative-based heaters have a limited maximum temperature of operation. , They begin to degrade in air above 200 °C (owing to a non-negligible amount of lattice defects), undergoing reactions that may be catalyzed by any organic moieties or other elemental impurities present …”