2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2015.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Juggling digitization and technostress: The case of alert fatigues in the patient care system implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alarm assessment and evaluation were suggested to be conducted prior to and after adopting an alarming medical device. 55 59 The assessment and evaluation were suggested to be conducted in a clinical environment and to check alarm types, audibility, validity and relevance. 10 17 Factors related to the environment and organisations where the alarms were located such as bed to alarm ratio, purpose and length of alarm conditions, staffing levels, high-risk patient ratio required intense monitoring, unit layout and background noise were also considered important.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alarm assessment and evaluation were suggested to be conducted prior to and after adopting an alarming medical device. 55 59 The assessment and evaluation were suggested to be conducted in a clinical environment and to check alarm types, audibility, validity and relevance. 10 17 Factors related to the environment and organisations where the alarms were located such as bed to alarm ratio, purpose and length of alarm conditions, staffing levels, high-risk patient ratio required intense monitoring, unit layout and background noise were also considered important.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from a patient’s vital signs are analyzed to modify early warning scores that can lead to predicting a cardiac arrest [ 9 ]. Even routinely available data analyzed by providers can lead to decisions on how to alter external actor engagement in supporting clients (e.g., emergency management technicians visiting clients at home, specialists consulting nursing home patients, and staff changes in patient rooms) [ 46 , 68 , 69 ]. In summary, frequent feedback from clients during value-in-use may lead to not only a reconfiguration of digital services, but also broaden the scope of actors used in value-in-use assessment.…”
Section: Designing a Digital Platform To Support Agilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the speed to respond to a nurse call is altered to improve patient satisfaction, using text alerts and escalation protocols that transfer calls to others when response time is slow, this alters the value fulfillment activities of the nursing staff. If there is a difference in the perceived value-in-use of the patients (e.g., immediate response to a call made to nursing staff) and the perceived value-in-use of the nursing staff (e.g., staff’s perception of the “urgency of the call” depending of the call source, for example surgical or cardiac patients vs. oncology or neurology patients) when the frequency of the value cycle is changed, it can lead to not meeting patient expectations [ 69 , 71 ]. In other words, increasing the value cycle frequency to address the context changes in the clients may have a negative impact, or be misaligned with the actors who are fulfilling the value created.…”
Section: Designing a Digital Platform To Support Agilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary customers for all these services are patients in a hospital room waiting for care or post-treatment during recovery and prior to discharge. The digitization of each patient service request, if handled by a nurse, can lead to too many alerts and contribute to stress (referred to as technostress [11]). While a robot can help reduce such stress, for the discussion here we will limit ourselves to value propositions that focus on patient support.…”
Section: Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%