2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11257-022-09345-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Justification of recommender systems results: a service-based approach

Abstract: With the increasing demand for predictable and accountable Artificial Intelligence, the ability to explain or justify recommender systems results by specifying how items are suggested, or why they are relevant, has become a primary goal. However, current models do not explicitly represent the services and actors that the user might encounter during the overall interaction with an item, from its selection to its usage. Thus, they cannot assess their impact on the user’s experience. To address this issue, we pro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the structure of this model allows to clearly distinguish the links between its elements (Larrañaga and Moral, 2011). Finally, the use of the model gives explainable results (Lacave and Diez, 2002;Müller et al, 2020), responding at the same time to the requirement of a predictable and responsible Artificial Intelligence (Kitson et al, 2023;Mauro et al, 2022). These properties make BNs a natural choice in fields such as WS (Hwang et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the structure of this model allows to clearly distinguish the links between its elements (Larrañaga and Moral, 2011). Finally, the use of the model gives explainable results (Lacave and Diez, 2002;Müller et al, 2020), responding at the same time to the requirement of a predictable and responsible Artificial Intelligence (Kitson et al, 2023;Mauro et al, 2022). These properties make BNs a natural choice in fields such as WS (Hwang et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%