1990
DOI: 10.1515/arbi.1990.8.1.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kent W. Hooper, Ernst Barlach’s Literary and Visual Art. The Issue of Multiple Talent.

Abstract: Ulrich Weisstein deren Niederschlag in den Aphorismen mit der negativen Theologie des späten Chassidismus zu verknüpfen: zu unterschiedlich sind hier die Voraussetzungen (S. iztf.). Hanna Naveh macht nicht recht plausibel, warum der Prozeß-Roman als Allegorie des Schöpfungsmythos zu lesen sei, als Parabel auf Chaos und Ordnung -die Distinktion der beiden Sphären bleibt unklar, die Begrifflichkeit unscharf (S. i8of.). Chris Bezzel gelingt es nicht, Kafkas "negative Dialektik" (auf die schon Adorno verwiesen hat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But latitude was first transformed by using the standard Mercator projection in order to make the two axes orthogonal and reduce any collinearity between latitude and longitude. For the most part, this operation created only slight changes in the estimates, although nontrivial shifts (greater than 2%) were experienced by both LATIT and DISTAN3 (Weisstein 2005). Compared with earlier models, the only noticeable difference that occurs among the factors is a reversal in the significance of factors 4 and 5, both of which are relatively marginal anyway.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…But latitude was first transformed by using the standard Mercator projection in order to make the two axes orthogonal and reduce any collinearity between latitude and longitude. For the most part, this operation created only slight changes in the estimates, although nontrivial shifts (greater than 2%) were experienced by both LATIT and DISTAN3 (Weisstein 2005). Compared with earlier models, the only noticeable difference that occurs among the factors is a reversal in the significance of factors 4 and 5, both of which are relatively marginal anyway.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The 'heptic collocation' method defined herein is identical to UH04's 'cubic collocation' method except that the expansion of f (η) in terms of the cubic-spline basis B i (η) is replaced by expansion in terms of H i (η) where, using the recursion formulae given in Weisstein (1999), H i (η) is the 7th-order spline-basis defined by…”
Section: (A) 'Heptic Collocation' Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Laplace equation has unique solutions for Dirichlet boundary conditions. () In our discretized context, this means that specifying Φ everywhere on the boundary should uniquely determine the a s. As a result, we expect the matrix [ A 1 ] to be invertible and write {}normalΦn=false[A2false]false[A1false]1{}normalΦ=[]S{}normalΦ. Equation can be further split and written in the following block matrix form {}arraynormalΦntwarraynormalΦnfs=[]arrayS11arrayS12arrayS21arrayS22{}arraynormalΦtwarraynormalΦfs where subscripts “tw” and “fs” represent the tank wall and the free surface, respectively. Using the boundary condition on the tank wall (Equation ) in Equation , we write normalΦtw=S111S12normalΦfs whence ()normalΦnfs=()S22S21S111S12normalΦ…”
Section: Boundary Element Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%