1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf02713989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic energy loss and convective acceleration in respiratory resistance measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
21
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The RETT may have masked any change in Rrs with a change in lung volume, inasmuch as ET tubes do not change in diameter during respiration, and errors are undoubtedly present in the calculation of RETT. Loring et al (27) demonstrated that the RETT is influenced by the kinetic energy losses due to flow separation, which is dependent on the geometry at the junction of the ET tube and the trachea in vivo and the geometry at the end of the ET tube in isolation. Any errors in the calculation of RETT arise from kinetic energy dissipation at the end of the ET tube and are dependent on the magnitude of the kinetic term ' /2 P(V/A)~, where p is the gas density, V is the gas flow, and A is the area at a given cross section.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RETT may have masked any change in Rrs with a change in lung volume, inasmuch as ET tubes do not change in diameter during respiration, and errors are undoubtedly present in the calculation of RETT. Loring et al (27) demonstrated that the RETT is influenced by the kinetic energy losses due to flow separation, which is dependent on the geometry at the junction of the ET tube and the trachea in vivo and the geometry at the end of the ET tube in isolation. Any errors in the calculation of RETT arise from kinetic energy dissipation at the end of the ET tube and are dependent on the magnitude of the kinetic term ' /2 P(V/A)~, where p is the gas density, V is the gas flow, and A is the area at a given cross section.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ET tubes used in this study had an internal diameter of 3.0 mm, and therefore the RETT calculated in vitro may significantly overestimate the in vivo RETT. The in vitro RETT may have more accurately estimated the in vivo RETT if the distal tip had been inserted into another tube with an internal diameter equal to the internal diameter of the trachea of the rabbits studied, as this would have reduced the cross-sectional area at the distal end of the ET tube and therefore flow separation and kinetic energy loss (27). However, flow separation in vivo depends on many factors, including the geometry of the ET tube-tracheal connection, the exact area of the trachea, the distance the ET tube is inserted into the trachea and the position or angulation of the distal ET tube.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Req was subtracted, wherever appropriate, so that the results reported represent intrinsic resistance values. Because abrupt changes of diameter were not present in our circuit, errors of measurement of flow resistance were avoided [14,15]. The equipment dead space was 0.4 ml.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is still uncertain whether test bench measurements may be safely applied in a clinical setting. Loring et al (9) noted that changes in the position or angulation of the distal ETT could cause several-fold changes in effective resistance and concluded: "These factors make it difficult, if not impossible, to estimate ETT resistance reliably." Also, Sly et al (10) seriously cautioned against the use of constants derived from in vitro experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%