2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic Monte Carlo modeling of multivalent binding of CTB proteins with GM1 receptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to simulate the dynamics of a signaling pathway of interest, prior understandings of the system are formulated into a system of nonlinear ODEs as its first-principle model. Since the first-principle model incorporates underlying mechanisms of the system, the model can be used to predict the system dynamics under new conditions and infer unmeasured model states' dynamics once the model is properly calibrated by experiments [2][3][4]86]. However, the development of such a first-principle model is nontrivial, and one of the largest bottlenecks in the model development process is lack of fundamental knowledge that may lead to the inaccurate formulation of a first-principle model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to simulate the dynamics of a signaling pathway of interest, prior understandings of the system are formulated into a system of nonlinear ODEs as its first-principle model. Since the first-principle model incorporates underlying mechanisms of the system, the model can be used to predict the system dynamics under new conditions and infer unmeasured model states' dynamics once the model is properly calibrated by experiments [2][3][4]86]. However, the development of such a first-principle model is nontrivial, and one of the largest bottlenecks in the model development process is lack of fundamental knowledge that may lead to the inaccurate formulation of a first-principle model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing literature shows that KMC simulations are powerful and versatile enough to tackle the above problem 12‐17 . This is possible because KMC describes spatio‐temporal evolution of chemical and biological systems at a reasonable computational cost 18‐22 . Specifically, KMC models have been used to study effect of temperature, 23 self‐diffusion, 24 passive layer formation, 25 and pulse charging strategy 26 on dendrite growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, an appropriate modeling framework has to be selected. Previous studies have used stochastic kinetic models to capture the intrinsic source of the cellular heterogeneity, which results from stochastic fluctuations in reaction kinetics . Generally, it is computationally expensive to use a stochastic kinetic model to simulate an intracellular biochemical reaction dynamics of a cell population, which makes the stochastic kinetic modeling approach not suitable to simulate the dynamics of a population of cells, as the calibration procedure for a cell‐population model usually involves thousands of the model simulations .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies 7,[9][10][11] have used stochastic kinetic models 12 to capture the intrinsic source of the cellular heterogeneity, which results from stochastic fluctuations in reaction kinetics. 4,6,13,14 Generally, it is computationally expensive to use a stochastic kinetic model to simulate an intracellular biochemical reaction dynamics of a cell population, 15,16 which makes the stochastic kinetic modeling approach not suitable to simulate the dynamics of a population of cells, as the calibration procedure for a cell-population model usually involves thousands of the model simulations. 17,18 Also, the stochastic kinetic modeling approach usually does not consider the extrinsic source of the cellular heterogeneity (i.e., the fundamental differences between cells that contribute to the cell-to-cell variability).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%