2007
DOI: 10.1021/jf0631777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of the Inhibition of Fusarium Serine Proteinases by Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Inhibitors

Abstract: Fungal infections of barley and wheat cause devastating losses of these food crops. The endogenous proteinase inhibitors produced by plant seeds probably defend the plants from pathogens by inhibiting the degradation of their proteins by the pathogen proteases. We have studied the interactions of barley grain inhibitors with the subtilisin-like and trypsinlike proteinases of Fusarium culmorum. The inhibition kinetics of three inhibitor proteins, chymotrypsin/subtilisin inhibitor 2 (CI-2), barley alpha-amylase/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for this lower degree of degradation of barley storage proteins in comparison to that found with wheat [11] may be (1) the localized infection that occurred only on selected single grains in barley [29], or perhaps (2) the occurrence of proteinase inhibition by microbial proteinase inhibitors such as barley BowmanBirk inhibitor (BBI) or serine protease inhibitor [30,31], or (3) the synthesis of pathogenesis-related proteins (chitinase), defence-response proteins (oxidative burst response), protein-synthesis-related proteins and proteins involved in the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis (phenole and indole derivates) pathway as a reaction to the Fusarium infection [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The reasons for this lower degree of degradation of barley storage proteins in comparison to that found with wheat [11] may be (1) the localized infection that occurred only on selected single grains in barley [29], or perhaps (2) the occurrence of proteinase inhibition by microbial proteinase inhibitors such as barley BowmanBirk inhibitor (BBI) or serine protease inhibitor [30,31], or (3) the synthesis of pathogenesis-related proteins (chitinase), defence-response proteins (oxidative burst response), protein-synthesis-related proteins and proteins involved in the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis (phenole and indole derivates) pathway as a reaction to the Fusarium infection [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The reasons for this eVect may be the existence or higher expression of protease inhibitors (serine proteinase inhibitors) in emmer than in wheat [27].…”
Section: The Inxuence Of Fusarium Infection On the Quantitative Protementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the rachis colonization when hyphae grow vertically [17], the toxin may inhibit the onset of various cell wall reinforcement processes in the vicinity of invading hyphae [18]. At the same time, fungal proteases are likely to participate in the suppression of plant defences by degrading pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins or defence-signalling compounds according to their property to cause proteolytic protein digestion [19-21]. In the spikes of the resistant landrace Wangshuibai the down-regulation of different housekeeping proteins was reported already 6 to 24 h after F. graminearum inoculation as a consequence of the secretion of fungal hydrolytic enzymes and toxins [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both virulence factors are probably essential for the penetration and mortification of host cells, as Fusarium pathogens use cell wall digestion to enter living host cells [30] and DON, in particular, is known to activate plant programmed cell death [31,32]. In summary, DON and proteases have a significant impact on cell wall digestion, protein matrix reduction and damage to starch granules, typically seen in Fusarium -infected wheat kernels rendering grain yield unsuitable and unsafe for food, feed or malting purposes [19,33-36]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%