2019
DOI: 10.1177/0278364919847763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinodynamic planning for spherical tensegrity locomotion with effective gait primitives

Abstract: Tensegrity-based robots can achieve locomotion through shape deformation and compliance. They are highly adaptable to their surroundings, and are lightweight, low cost, and physically robust. Their high dimensionality and strongly dynamic nature, however, can complicate motion planning. Efforts to date have primarily considered quasi-static reconfiguration and short-term dynamic motion of tensegrity robots, which do not fully exploit the underlying system dynamics in the long term. Longer-horizon planning has … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though the rolling gaits listed in Table 3 are all represented as using TC-6 or TO-5 as the initial touching-ground triangle, they are also applicable to other initial states due to the pyritohedral symmetry of the structure with order S ¼ 24, which means that there are 24 unique combinations of rotations and reflections that result in an equivalent configuration. 22 As a result, the repeated tests for each gait are conducted by switching the starting touching-ground triangle according to the pyritohedral symmetry of the structure. Specifically, six tests are conducted for each gait in gaits 1-12, and the corresponding starting touching-ground triangles are TC-1, TC-2, TC-3, TC-4, TC-6, and TC-7, respectively, in which TC-2, TC-3, and TC-7 can be transformed into each other by a rotation operation with a rotation angle of 120 , and TC-1 and TC-6 can be transformed into each other by a combined rotation(60 )-reflection operation, while six tests are conducted for each gait in gaits 13-30, and the corresponding starting touching-ground triangles are TO-1, TO-2, TO-3, TO-4, TO-5, and TO-6, respectively, in which TO-1 and TO-2 (as well as TO-4 and TO-5) can be transformed into each other by a reflection operation, and TO-3 and TO-5 (as well as TO-6 and TO-2) can be transformed into each other by a rotation operation with a rotation angle of 180 .…”
Section: Experiments Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though the rolling gaits listed in Table 3 are all represented as using TC-6 or TO-5 as the initial touching-ground triangle, they are also applicable to other initial states due to the pyritohedral symmetry of the structure with order S ¼ 24, which means that there are 24 unique combinations of rotations and reflections that result in an equivalent configuration. 22 As a result, the repeated tests for each gait are conducted by switching the starting touching-ground triangle according to the pyritohedral symmetry of the structure. Specifically, six tests are conducted for each gait in gaits 1-12, and the corresponding starting touching-ground triangles are TC-1, TC-2, TC-3, TC-4, TC-6, and TC-7, respectively, in which TC-2, TC-3, and TC-7 can be transformed into each other by a rotation operation with a rotation angle of 120 , and TC-1 and TC-6 can be transformed into each other by a combined rotation(60 )-reflection operation, while six tests are conducted for each gait in gaits 13-30, and the corresponding starting touching-ground triangles are TO-1, TO-2, TO-3, TO-4, TO-5, and TO-6, respectively, in which TO-1 and TO-2 (as well as TO-4 and TO-5) can be transformed into each other by a reflection operation, and TO-3 and TO-5 (as well as TO-6 and TO-2) can be transformed into each other by a rotation operation with a rotation angle of 180 .…”
Section: Experiments Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chang et al 21 presented a path planning method based on basic rolling gaits using the A* algorithm. Littlefield et al 22 proposed approaches to produce long-term locomotion using rolling gaits, in which a standard search method is used for simple environments and an informed sampling-based planner for complex environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison between the modelbased and data-based approach is an emerging topic of recent research [ [29]]. Both of these active control strategies are useful for the deployment of tensegrity-based civil engineering structures [ [30], [31]], and tensegrity robots [ [32], [33], [34], [35]]. In this paper, a model-based output regulation approach for the nonlinear shape control of a general "classk" tensegrity structure using control Lyapunov function is discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An area where lightweight and high-performance actuators could find use is in the development of space exploration robots such as tensegrity robots. Tensegrity robots consist of interlocking struts and cables that can perform diverse motions when deformed. , However, tensegrity robots that can produce rolling motions using lengthening struts or moving weights have been shown. , Different methods to predict the performance of these gaits have been demonstrated including simulation and reinforcement learning. , Rolling motions with soft actuators has only been demonstrated using McKibben muscles and liquid crystal elastomer–carbon nanotube composite actuators. Shape memory polymers struts have also been used to realize self-deploying tensegrity structures . However, these soft actuator-based robots remain slow and have not brought forth new locomotion strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 However, tensegrity robots that can produce rolling motions using lengthening struts or moving weights have been shown. 25,26 Different methods to predict the performance of these gaits have been demonstrated including simulation and reinforcement learning. 27,28 Rolling motions with soft actuators has only been demonstrated using McKibben muscles and liquid crystal elastomer−carbon nanotube composite actuators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%