2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16327-2_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Granularity and Representation of Knowledge: Towards Knowledge Grid

Abstract: Abstract. Knowledge granularity, usually identified with the size of knowledge granules, seems to be real challenge for knowledge consumers as well as for knowledge creators. In this paper, relationships between knowledge granularity as a result of different ways of a knowledge representation are considered. The paper deals with the problem of developing knowledge grid in the context of encapsulation of knowledge including different dimensions and measures. The origin of the problem is discussed in the first s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ultimate objective is to transform information into knowledge and later even into wisdom. Knowledge, in tandem with business intelligence tools, shows out to be effective in supporting activities connected to the quality of the decision-making process (Mach & Owoc, 2010;Wieder & Ossimitz, 2015). Still, additional processing of information is not the aim of this study.…”
Section: Figure 22 Six Steps Of Conversion Of Data Into Informationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The ultimate objective is to transform information into knowledge and later even into wisdom. Knowledge, in tandem with business intelligence tools, shows out to be effective in supporting activities connected to the quality of the decision-making process (Mach & Owoc, 2010;Wieder & Ossimitz, 2015). Still, additional processing of information is not the aim of this study.…”
Section: Figure 22 Six Steps Of Conversion Of Data Into Informationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…On the one hand, the concept of granularity regained importance in areas from computing to human reasoning, as a component of knowledge representation in cognition and knowledge production. Knowledge is structured and organised or "encapsulated" in different-sized pieces and levels of detail that enhance accuracy and flexibility of interpretation (Mach & Owoc, 2010). According to Pawlak (1998), knowledge granularity is strictly connected with the indiscernibility of the smallest discrete knowledge pieces.…”
Section: New Ontologies Of Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• heterogeneous instances: over time different occurrences of the same value have different meanings in a domain extension; for instance, if the organization merge or split departments, then the preserved naming represent a different set of resources (e.g. employees, faculties); • cardinality changes: in particular, cardinality relationships between domains might also change over time; in other words, the number of occurrences in one entity which are associated to the number of occurrences in another are not always constant; for example, a 1-to-n relationship between departments and faculties may be changed to m-to-n as a result of new legal regulations; • granularity transition: from existing population values, having different granularity, might be added to a domain extension; for instance, the numeration of rooms or buildings might be changed due to the merge or acquisition [84,85]; • encoding changes: particular values might have also encoded meaning, which neither is known, nor provided elsewhere; for example, the naming of projects successfully delivered are eventually different from the others (failed, cancelled, etc. ; see [86]); • time zone and unit differences: organization sites use local time zone and units which globally differ; thus directly comparing such values may be irrelevant; • identifier changes: the organization needs changes over time; as a consequence the indexing strategies may also change over time, leading in parallel or overlapping naming schemas; for instance, the codes of the products, previously 4-digits numbers, now having additional 6 zeros, are different for both the users and IT systems; • field recycling: in some systems it is difficult or even infeasible to alter certain database properties; in this case there might be a need to shrink the database or even implement a new instance with a different naming schema, replacing the existing ones; for example, a company might shift from hierarchical to a matrix structures, remodeling data structures [87,88,89].…”
Section: Knowledge Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%