The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Training, Development, and Performance Improvement 2014
DOI: 10.1002/9781118736982.ch9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Transfer and Organizational Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recognizing the collective value of learning through storytelling highlights a final contribution of this work to the literatures on storytelling and vicarious learning in organizations: it adopts a cross-level perspective, revealing how interpersonal storytelling interactions and the broader structures and collective practices in which these interactions are situated can coalesce in the enactment of vicarious learning. Much of the literature on vicarious learning is focused at the organizational level of analysis, either exploring formal organizational practices that promote knowledge sharing among units within a firm or examining how organizations use other firms’ experience to enhance their own learning and performance (e.g., Huber, 1991; Haunschild and Miner, 1997; Hansen, Nohria, and Tierney, 1999; Madsen and Desai, 2010; Argote, 2015). Meanwhile, research on storytelling is generally focused at the individual, dyadic, or small-group level of analysis, given the inherently interpersonal nature of storytelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recognizing the collective value of learning through storytelling highlights a final contribution of this work to the literatures on storytelling and vicarious learning in organizations: it adopts a cross-level perspective, revealing how interpersonal storytelling interactions and the broader structures and collective practices in which these interactions are situated can coalesce in the enactment of vicarious learning. Much of the literature on vicarious learning is focused at the organizational level of analysis, either exploring formal organizational practices that promote knowledge sharing among units within a firm or examining how organizations use other firms’ experience to enhance their own learning and performance (e.g., Huber, 1991; Haunschild and Miner, 1997; Hansen, Nohria, and Tierney, 1999; Madsen and Desai, 2010; Argote, 2015). Meanwhile, research on storytelling is generally focused at the individual, dyadic, or small-group level of analysis, given the inherently interpersonal nature of storytelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, this literature has generally assumed that vicarious learning in organizations occurs either through a process of observing and imitating actions taken in other groups (consistent with similar work at the organizational level of analysis; e.g., Haunschild and Miner, 1997; Baum, Li, and Usher, 2000; Madsen and Desai, 2010) or through the use of organizational systems for capturing and disseminating the lessons of others’ experience (Alavi and Leidner, 2001; Argote, 2015). Yet the nature of work in today’s knowledge-intensive organizations has rendered many of these assumptions untenable (Bresman, 2013; Myers and DeRue, 2017), leaving our understanding of vicarious learning out of step with the realities of work in modern organizations (as much of the literature focuses on more stable, low-uncertainty work contexts; see Greve, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct experience will normally be more costly to the organisation, but will also provide greater potential for unique and relevant learning than indirect experience (Schulz, 2001). Argote (2014) highlights research indicating that indirect experience both substitutes and complements direct experience. One potentially important factor determining whether knowledge can be transferred between organisational units is the relationship between the units.…”
Section: Organisational Learning After Adverse Eventsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…First and foremost, it is a process in which a person or group acquires new knowledge. It can also be said to be stored in an organisation's routines and procedures (Levitt and March, 1988), regulations (March et al ., 2000), products and processes, technology and equipment, culture and norms (Argote, 2014) and in individuals (Starbuck, 1992).…”
Section: Organisational Learning After Adverse Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiencing failure were related with product innovation result [10]. Various learning processes can be gained from internal and external of organization [11] and [12]. Many firms adopt innovation capability as organization's core competence of a firm and spend billions into the R&D process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%