Körperliche Aktivität und deren Effekte auf das Burn-out-Syndrom – Ein systematisches Review

Dreher, M; Dößereck, Nils; Lachtermann, Ella

doi:10.1055/a-0826-1014

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Various studies prove the relation between exercise such as aerobic and anaerobic physical activities and its relationship with burnout (Jonsdottir et al, 2010 ; Toker and Biron, 2012 ; Lindwall et al, 2014 ; Hu et al, 2016 ; Dreher et al, 2018 ). According to Hu et al ( 2016 ), workers who work more than 60 h a week and do not engage in any physical activity have the highest risk ratio of developing burnout.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to Hu et al ( 2016 ), workers who work more than 60 h a week and do not engage in any physical activity have the highest risk ratio of developing burnout. It was demonstrated that professionals who are engaged in light physical activity or moderate physical activity are less likely to report high levels of burnout and perceived stress compared to professionals who are not engaged in physical activity (sedentary lifestyle) (Stenlund et al, 2009 ; Jonsdottir et al, 2010 ; Gerber et al, 2013 ; Tsai et al, 2013 ; Dreher et al, 2018 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Bio-Psycho-Socio-Spirito-Cultural Factors of Burnout: A Systematic Narrative Review of the Literature

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Burnout is a widespread, multifactorial, and mainly psychological phenomenon. The pathogenesis of burnout is commonly described within the bio-psycho-social model of health and disease. Recent literature suggests that the phenomenon of burnout may be broader so that the three dimensions might not reflect the multifaceted and complex nature of the syndrome. Consequently, this review aims to identify the diversity of factors related to burnout, to define overarching categories based on these, and to clarify whether the bio-psycho-social model adequately describes the pathogenesis of burnout—holistically and sufficiently.Method: Five online databases (PubMed, PubPsych, PsychARTICLES, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, and Google Scholar) were systematically searched using defined search terms to identify relevant studies. The publication date was set between January 1981 and November 2020. Based on the selected literature, we identified factors related to burnout. We aggregated these factors into a comprehensible list and assigned them to overarching categories. Then, we assigned the factors to the dimensions of an extended model of health and disease.Results: We identified a total of 40 burnout-related factors and 10 overarching categories. Our results show that in addition to biological, psychological, and socio-environmental factors, various factors that can be assigned to a spiritual and work cultural dimension also play an important role in the onset of burnout.Conclusion: An extended bio-psycho-socio-spirito-cultural model is necessary to describe the pathogenesis of burnout. Therefore, future studies should also focus on spiritual and work cultural factors when investigating burnout. Furthermore, these factors should not be neglected in future developments of diagnosis, treatment, and prevention options.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bio-Psycho-Socio-Spirito-Cultural Factors of Burnout: A Systematic Narrative Review of the Literature

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this context, factors such as high workload (Maslach and Leiter, 2008;Asensio-Martínez et al, 2017), low control at work (Brouwers et al, 2011), and high work demands [according to the job strain model/demand control model by Karasek (1979), Demerouti et al (2001) and Kivimäki et al (2006)] are mentioned in various studies. Furthermore, role ambiguity (Maslach and Leiter, 2008;Vassos and Nankervis, 2012), private support or collegial support (Baruch-Feldman et al, 2002, Charoensukmongkol et al, 2016, work-family conflict (Blundson et al, 2006;Brouwers et al, 2011;Vassos and Nankervis, 2012), coping strategies (Shin et al, 2014;Mattei et al, 2017), low recovery/low psychological detachment (Sonnentag et al, 2010;Sonnentag, 2018), physical activities (Dreher et al, 2018), and effort-reward imbalance (Schulz et al, 2009;Basińska and Wilczek-Ruzyczka, 2013;Jachens et al, 2019) have been investigated in association with burnout. Additional factors such as the Big Five personality traits (Castillo-Gualda et al, 2019), resilience (Nevill and Havercamp, 2019), self-esteem, self-efficacy (Alarcon et al, 2009), and perfectionistic concerns (Rice and Liu, 2020) are also associated with burnout.…”

Section: Burnout Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Spirituality, Work Culture, and Burnout: The Need for an Extended Health and Disease Model

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Apart from biological, psychological, and social factors, recent studies indicate that spirituality and work culture also play an important role in the onset of burnout. Hence, the commonly applied bio-psycho-social model of health and disease might not be sufficient to comprehensively explain and describe burnout. This study empirically investigates the relationship between spirituality (operationalized by perceived meaningfulness of work) and work culture (operationalized by sense of homeliness of the working environment) with burnout risk and work engagement. For this purpose, an anonymous cross-sectional data collection with fully standardized questionnaires and selected socio-demographic and work-related items was conducted among working adults (n = 439) from different industries via social media and local health service centers. For all scales and subscales, we found significant moderate to strong correlations. Furthermore, positive meaning within the perceived meaningfulness of work scale was the largest beta coefficient for burnout (β = −0.65) and work engagement (β = 0.62). Within sense of homeliness, the largest beta coefficient for burnout was needs fulfillment (β = −0.34) and work engagement emotional connection (β = 0.36). The strong associations suggest that the current health and disease model needs to be expanded to a bio-psycho-socio-spirito-cultural model to be able to sufficiently describe burnout. The perceived meaningfulness of work and a sense of homeliness should be adequately considered when examining the onset of burnout, describing burnout as a concept, and explaining work engagement.

show abstract

“…Within available exercise intervention studies that are aimed to reduce burnout, a broad range of exercise doses has been applied (Dreher et al, 2018;Naczenski et al, 2017), and programmes with a duration of 4 to 18 weeks with exercise sessions ranging from one to three times a week have been shown to be effective (Naczenski et al, 2017). However, so far, it has rarely been examined which amount of exposure to exercise is minimally required for the interventions' beneficial effects on burnout symptoms to become visible (Naczenski et al, 2017).…”

Section: Minimal Exposurementioning

confidence: 99%

Process evaluation of the receipt of an exercise intervention for fatigued employees: the role of exposure and exercise experiences

Vries

Hooff

Geurts

et al. 2020

European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Work-related fatigue among employees is related to negative consequences. Therefore, it is valuable to evaluate interventions that potentially reduce fatigue and increase health and well-being among these employees. The present study investigated whether variations in the receipt of an exercise intervention for fatigued employees were related to intervention effectiveness. We investigated (a) whether exposure to the exercise intervention was related to differences in employees' health and well-being trajectories throughout the intervention, (b) the amount of exposure that is minimally required before health and well-being effects become visible, and (c) whether exercise experiences (pleasure, psychological detachment, and effort) were related to differences in health and well-being trajectories throughout the intervention. Fatigued employees were randomly allocated to a 6-week exercise intervention (n = 49) or a wait list (n = 47). Participants were measured before, 5 times during, and at the end of the intervention concerning health and well-being indicators (all participants) and exercise experiences (only exercisers). Latent growth curve modelling showed that sufficient exposure and optimal exercise experiences contribute to the success of an exercise intervention for fatigued employees. Furthermore, it was shown that health and well-being effects of exercise are visible early in time.

show abstract

Körperliche Aktivität und deren Effekte auf das Burn-out-Syndrom – Ein systematisches Review

Cited by 4 publications

References 42 publications

Bio-Psycho-Socio-Spirito-Cultural Factors of Burnout: A Systematic Narrative Review of the Literature

Bio-Psycho-Socio-Spirito-Cultural Factors of Burnout: A Systematic Narrative Review of the Literature

An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Spirituality, Work Culture, and Burnout: The Need for an Extended Health and Disease Model

Process evaluation of the receipt of an exercise intervention for fatigued employees: the role of exposure and exercise experiences

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About