Kraepelins Bedeutung für die Psychologie

Gruhle, Hans W.

doi:10.1007/bf01797172

Cited by 12 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Gaupp demanded the inclusion of constitutive biology in research, to do justice to atypical descriptions. Gruhle complained about the lack of psychological research in Kraepelin's psychiatry and called his working methods naïve and unconcerned with scientific thinking 31 . Mayer‐Gross blamed Kraepelin's anatomical viewpoint and his inability to see a multidimensional psychiatry 32 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Gruhle complained about the lack of psychological research in Kraepelin's psychiatry and called his working methods naïve and unconcerned with scientific thinking. 31 Mayer-Gross blamed Kraepelin's anatomical viewpoint and his inability to see a multidimensional psychiatry. 32 Recent discussion has focused on the limitations of dichotomy and the conceptual difficulties for the trans-syndromal approaches in the future classifications of ICD-11 and DSM-V.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reception of Kraepelin's ideas 1900–1960

Palm¹,

Möller

2011

Psychiatry Clin Neurosci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Kraepelin's system of mental diseases has contributed substantially to the foundation of modern psychiatric diagnosis in the DSM-IV and ICD-10. Considering Kraepelin's influence in the creation of these diagnostic tools, the question arises as to how Kraepelin's contemporaries and successors reacted to his nosology. Historical libraries and archives in Munich, Berlin and Paris were searched for European and American psychiatric literature using the keywords 'Kraepelin', 'dichotomy' and 'manic-depressive disorder'. Literature from 1900 to 1960 was examined and compared to the current literature regarding Kraepelin's impact on modern classification systems. The sixth edition of Kraepelin's 'Lehrbuch' (1899) presented the dichotomy in its entirety and led to three different periods of critical comment on dichotomy and methodology between 1900 and 1960. But on the whole, Kraepelin's system was quickly and completely adopted in clinical diagnosis. The publications appearing on and following Kraepelin's centenary in 1956 represent his work as generally being the foundation of modern psychiatry. The neo-Kraepelinian movement, beginning in the late 1960s, developed more differentiated views of Kraepelin's scientific background and methodology. Notwithstanding all the criticism of Kraepelin's dichotomy, it remains more than ever the basis of psychiatric diagnosis. The criticism today shows parallels to the statements made during Kraepelin's era, mainly concerning the issue of diagnostic overlapping of the two disease entities, manic-depressive disorder and schizophrenia, and includes the question of syndromatology.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reception of Kraepelin's ideas 1900–1960

Palm¹,

Möller

2011

Psychiatry Clin Neurosci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Il se trouve que la réception des entités kraepeliniennes a laissé presque intacte la question de cette construction : elle a trop souvent suivi Kraepelin, non pas seulement dans ses délimitations nosographiques, mais en souscrivant en plus elle-même au réalisme 9 un peu naïf qui l'a orienté dans sa recherche obstinée « des faits et non des théories » ( [38], p. 45). Moyennant quoi elle s'est interdite d'interroger les ressorts de leur construction : elle s'est trop vite contentée des faits ramassés, croyant saisir sous la plume empirique de Kraepelin des faits en quelque sorte bruts, oubliant qu'il n'y en a pas de si spontanés qu'ils n'interdisent toute question à leur adresse.…”

Section: De L'« Empirisme » De La Démarche Kraepelinienneunclassified

La psychiatrie néo-kraepelinienne à l’épreuve de l’histoire. Nouvelles considérations sur la nosologie kraepelinienne

Lepoutre

2017

L'Évolution Psychiatrique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nor did Kraepelin's death in 1926 prompt commentators to arrive at any more favorable judgment of his experimental work. One of his students noted that Kraepelin had failed utterly in efforts to introduce the concepts of experimental psychology into his clinical nosology (Gruhle 1929). And several years later another was still more explicit in his assessment, believing that Kraepelin had overestimated the significance of Wundt's methods and had been biased in applying them.…”

Section: Reconciling Clinical Nosology and Experimental Psychologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Emil Kraepelin’s Inaugural Lecture in Dorpat: Contexts and Legacies

Engström¹

2016

Trames

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In his inaugural lecture delivered at the University of Dorpat in 1886, the German psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin presented one of the most concise accounts of the state of psychiatric research in the late nineteenth century. In his lecture, Kraepelin criticized the patho-anatomic research of contemporary neuropsychiatrists and argued that psychiatric research needed to be augmented by a new emphasis on experimental psychology. This article explores the historical contexts that informed Kraepelin's research agenda in experimental psychology. It argues that Kraepelin's early experimental research in Dorpat served as a catalyst for his later clinical research in Heidelberg in the sense that it evoked recognition of the importance of disease course and prompted him to expand the breadth of available information about patients beyond what laboratory research could provide. Kraepelin's experimental research can therefore neither be dismissed entirely, nor posited as the wellspring of his nosology, but needs instead to be viewed as a crucial tool of accurate diagnostic practice.

show abstract

Kraepelins Bedeutung für die Psychologie

Cited by 12 publications

References 0 publications

Reception of Kraepelin's ideas 1900–1960

Reception of Kraepelin's ideas 1900–1960

La psychiatrie néo-kraepelinienne à l’épreuve de l’histoire. Nouvelles considérations sur la nosologie kraepelinienne

Emil Kraepelin’s Inaugural Lecture in Dorpat: Contexts and Legacies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About