1981
DOI: 10.2172/6618417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kramer station fabric filter evaluation. Final report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six fly ash samples, two blanks, and one control were cut into three or four pieces to check uniformity. Samples were analyzed at the Nuclear Radiation Center, Washington State University, by using INAA methods described previously (16,10). The samples from stages 23 through 27 and the blanks and controls were analyzed a second time because of the larger relative interference from the low concentrations of elements in the polyethylene bags in which the samples were originally sealed and analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Six fly ash samples, two blanks, and one control were cut into three or four pieces to check uniformity. Samples were analyzed at the Nuclear Radiation Center, Washington State University, by using INAA methods described previously (16,10). The samples from stages 23 through 27 and the blanks and controls were analyzed a second time because of the larger relative interference from the low concentrations of elements in the polyethylene bags in which the samples were originally sealed and analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from one of the studies (7,10), at the Kramer Station, may represent a lower limit of some sort since this boiler had the smallest submicrometer fume mass concentration of the six boilers on which our group made total submicrometer fume mass measurements (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typically, ESPs have a penetration window in the particle size range of 0.1-1 µm. In pulverized coal combustion, even 10% of the particles in this size range may penetrate the ESP (10)(11)(12). Fabric filter collection efficiency also decreases with decreasing particle size, but with a well-maintained fabric filter, the maximum penetration is typically significantly lower than with ESPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baghouses evaluated encompassed a representative sampling of unit size, design, and fuels, and are listed in Table II. Data taken at the Nucla and Kramer stations reported by Ensor et al 4 ' 5 under earlier EPRI sponsorship are included in the table as well. Also, for comparison with these full-scale units, EPRFs two pilot baghouses-the lowsulfur coal fabric filter pilot plant (FFPP) at the Public Service Co. of Colorado's Arapahoe Station in Denver, and the high-sulfur coal fabric filter pilot plant (HSFP) at Gulf Power Co.'s Scholz station near Sneads, Floridaare included in the data base.…”
Section: Baghouses Evaluatedmentioning
confidence: 99%