L'accueil gérontologique médicosocial aux urgences: une alternative à l'hospitalisation des personnes âgées en médecine?

Gentric, A.; Duquesne, F; Graziana, A; Sivy, H; Duges, F; Garo, B.; Boles, JM

doi:10.1016/s0248-8663(97)83417-0

Cited by 14 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…ED in-reach models were described in 28 studies describing 27 care models. This included 2 randomised controlled trials, [84,85] 1 randomised controlled trial protocol without results [86], 12 observational studies with a comparator group [87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98] and 13 descriptive studies without a comparator group [99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111]. A detailed description of the care models is provided in Supplementary Table 2C.…”

Section: Ed In-reach Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Acute care models for older people living with frailty: a systematic review and taxonomy

Knight,

Kamwa,

Atkin

et al. 2023

BMC Geriatr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The need to improve the acute care pathway to meet the care needs of older people living with frailty is a strategic priority for many healthcare systems. The optimal care model for this patient group is unclear. Methods A systematic review was conducted to derive a taxonomy of acute care models for older people with acute medical illness and describe the outcomes used to assess their effectiveness. Care models providing time-limited episodes of care (up to 14 days) within 48 h of presentation to patients over the age of 65 with acute medical illness were included. Care models based in hospital and community settings were eligible. Searches were undertaken in Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane databases. Interventions were described and classified in detail using a modified version of the TIDIeR checklist for complex interventions. Outcomes were described and classified using the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) taxonomy. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB2 and ROBINS-I. Results The inclusion criteria were met by 103 articles. Four classes of acute care model were identified, acute-bed based care, hospital at home, emergency department in-reach and care home models. The field is dominated by small single centre randomised and non-randomised studies. Most studies were judged to be at risk of bias. A range of outcome measures were reported with little consistency between studies. Evidence of effectiveness was limited. Conclusion Acute care models for older people living with frailty are heterogenous. The clinical effectiveness of these models cannot be conclusively established from the available evidence. Trial registration PROSPERO registration (CRD42021279131).

show abstract