2000
DOI: 10.3406/rfsp.2000.395466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L'intégration européenne vue par l'approche cognitive et normative des politiques publiques

Abstract: European integration : the cognitive and normative approach This article seeks to ascertain the interest and limits of cognitive policy analysis by applying it to European integration. Cognitive analysis is based on the premise that public policies result from social interactions leading to the production of common ideas, representations and values. Often criticized because of its methodological limitations, this approach seems apt to be applied successfully to the study of the European Union on two basic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
13

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…It was frequently used by authors who were reluctant to use the term of Euroscepticism in relationship to topics not connected to contemporary party politics. They found the term resistance more appropriate to talk about governments or social actors (Goldstone, 1998;Surel, 2000;Nicolaı¨dis & Schmidt, 2007;Ho¨pner & Scha¨fer, 2007;Schmitter, 2008;Balme & Chabanet, 2008; and to picture hostility towards Europe as a polymorphous phenomenon. The notion of resistance was also used to analyze structural trends over the long term (Caporaso & Tarrow, 2008) and by a group of historians to encompass several historical contexts since the origins of the European project (Guieu et al, 2006).…”
Section: Resistances Focus On the Gap Between Actors' Perception Of Wmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It was frequently used by authors who were reluctant to use the term of Euroscepticism in relationship to topics not connected to contemporary party politics. They found the term resistance more appropriate to talk about governments or social actors (Goldstone, 1998;Surel, 2000;Nicolaı¨dis & Schmidt, 2007;Ho¨pner & Scha¨fer, 2007;Schmitter, 2008;Balme & Chabanet, 2008; and to picture hostility towards Europe as a polymorphous phenomenon. The notion of resistance was also used to analyze structural trends over the long term (Caporaso & Tarrow, 2008) and by a group of historians to encompass several historical contexts since the origins of the European project (Guieu et al, 2006).…”
Section: Resistances Focus On the Gap Between Actors' Perception Of Wmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The first of these strands calls itself 'a cognitive approach to public policy' (Muller 1995(Muller , 2000Surel 2000;Surel and Hassenteufel 2000). By studying shifts in the ideational framework of public policy, the authors involved claim to be able to identify the impact of European arenas and norms on the way public intervention has changed over the last twenty years.…”
Section: Continued Differentiation At the Level Of Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De acordo Yves Surel (2000) as políticas públicas são o resultado de interações sociais que ocasionam a produção de ideias, representações e valores comuns. E eles, por sua vez, acabam por defi nir a maneira como os atores enxergam os problemas públicos e como concebem as respostas a esses problemas.…”
Section: -A Construção Do Referencialunclassified