2018
DOI: 10.4000/terminal.2136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La participation numérique en urbanisme, une simple amplification des processus existants ?

Abstract: Panorama des innovations sociales numériques La participation numérique en urbanisme, une simple amplification des processus existants ? Le cas de la plateforme citoyenne « Demain, Mons » Smart participation in urban planning, as the 70's or such better? The case of the citizen platform « Demain, Mons »

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the left (for Arnstein), information is symbolic participation. On the right (for Pouleur et al [14]), correct information is the basis for participation.…”
Section: Materials From Ngo Fields Have Been Inspiring Since the 60smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the left (for Arnstein), information is symbolic participation. On the right (for Pouleur et al [14]), correct information is the basis for participation.…”
Section: Materials From Ngo Fields Have Been Inspiring Since the 60smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most people can't read or write..."), 13 as well as the efficiency of the participation process itself ("We mustn't arouse any desires"). 14 This attitude, which is sometimes legitimately justified by the fear of disappointing residents if decisions taken at other levels of power go against their wishes, has positioned the debate at a technical level (on the right of the figure), distancing it from the expertise of residents, which is nevertheless very valuable for understanding the desirable improvements for the neighbourhood. These mechanisms of mistrust, difficulty in sharing power, and dominance of the technical argument are found in the literature.…”
Section: Complex Participation Processes With Multiple Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation