La perception de la responsabilité sociale des Entreprises : adaptation et validation française de l’échelle de Maignan et Ferrell, 1999

Perceptions of corporate social responsibility, organizational commitment and job satisfaction

“…The second part is concerned with expectations; for example, "I expect my company to sponsor scientific research". The factorial structure of the scale obtained by Closon (2009) is appreciably different from that of Maignan and Ferrell's scale: The legal and ethical dimensions are confusing, and the internal or external character of the CSR seems to constitute two independent factors. It results in a structure with four factors: legal and ethical policies towards internal actors (seven items; for perceptions: ␣ ϭ 0.85; for expectations: ␣ ϭ 0.80), legal and ethical policies towards external actors (five items; for perceptions: ␣ ϭ 0.85; for expectations: ␣ ϭ 0.84), economic policies (five items; for perceptions: ␣ ϭ 0.81; for expectations: ␣ ϭ 0.80) and philanthropic policies (five items; for perceptions, ␣ ϭ 0.72; for expectations, ␣ ϭ 0.74).…”

“…The Cronbach alpha is 0.81. This scale was constructed and validated by us in a previous study (Closon, 2009). This study did show that we could get satisfying psychometric and validity characteristics of scores from the resulting shortened scales.…”

“…The scale is composed of two parts with the same 22 items, but with two different instructions (Appendix 1). Perceptions scale and expectations scale have the same factorial solution (Closon, 2009). The first part investigates perceptions; for example, "I think my company proposes policies that allow its employees to reconcile work and private life".…”

“…Corporate social responsibility revisit the relevance or at least the operationalization of these philanthropic practices that pose, in our opinion (Closon, 2009), significant questions in a European socio-political context. We suggest that a positive relationship between commitment and satisfaction in economics (like a good father) could increase pride and sense of security.…”

Regard multidimensionnel des conceptions du vivant : situation en contexte québécois

“…Présentée dans le tableau 1, la démarche méthodologique s'inscrit dans un processus itératif entre le construit théorique, l'enquête et l'analyse des énoncés ain de mieux progresser au cours des étapes de puriication et de rafinement de l'échelle de mesure. Ce processus a pour objectif de réduire les biais d'erreurs de mesure aléatoire et systématique et d'assurer une échelle dont la iabilité et la validité interne ont été éprouvées (Closon, 2009 ;Roussel, 2005). Cette démarche a permis d'estimer, d'une part, la cohérence interne de l'instrument de mesure où le répondant à un patron similaire de réponses aux énoncés d'une même variable conceptuelle et, d'autre part, de valider le construit en regard du cadre théorique (Roussel, 2005).…”