La responsabilité sociale des entreprises dans les pays européens en transition : Réalité et limites

Koleva, Petia

doi:10.1051/larsg:2005013

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These include inclusive terms such as corporate responsibility, corporate citizenship, sustainability, and corporate social performance. While these terms are used synonymously by many, others argue corporate sustainability is a subset of CSR (Agle et al, 1999;Graves and Waddock, 1994;Turban and Greening 1997), CSR is a subset of ethics (Argandona and von Weltzien Hoivik 2010;Weitzner and Darroch, 2009), CSR is a micro-economic translation of sustainable development (Koleva, 2005), while others state it is a unique function within business (Votaw, 1972). Still others look to CSR as a term that does not need universal definition (Campbell, 2007;Palazzo and Scherer, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Vision of Four Nations

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Vision of Four Nations

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In mature markets, socially responsible issues have gained considerable traction (Attig and Brockman, 2017), but countries do not approach CSR in the same way (Maignan and Ralston, 2002). The existence of a European model for CSR is highly contested, since stakeholders' perception of socially responsible practices can vary considerably from one country to another (Koleva, 2005). Furthermore, each country highlights a strategic aspect of CSR.…”

Section: Implementing Csr: Being Responsible Within Developing and Mature Marketsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oil companies, social responsibility and CSP: combining actions and profiles

Pündrich

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to focus on the influence of socio-economic and cultural factors and their influence on corporate social performance (CSP) (Clarkson, 1995) within developing and mature economies. It aims at identifying the characteristics of socially responsible actions within two contexts: France and Brazil. Design/methodology/approach Based on a case study methodology and a press database, this paper analyzes two oil companies, the French group Total SA, and the Brazilian company Petrobras. Findings By focusing on corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions in different socio-economic and cultural contexts, it was possible to identify a predominant CSP “proactivity” in both companies; observe a difference in CSR discourse and practice; note a heterogenic and composite CSR; and notice that companies do not choose their CSP posture, but are subjected to external classifications. Research limitations/implications The analysis of only one company per socio-economic and cultural context belonging to the same field could be considered as a limitation, although it allows a deeper analysis of events within both organizations. Practical implications Apprehending CSP within different contexts may help decision makers to better understand companies’ socially responsible postures and to observe the socio-economic and cultural factors that can influence them. Originality/value This paper highlights CSR practices and their CSP under different socio-economic and cultural perspectives for a more comprehensive understanding of factors that motivate and direct the actions of big corporate organizations.

show abstract

“…Većina autora je danas saglasna u tome da se pojam KDO odnosi i na etička i moralna pitanja korporativnog odlučivanja i ponašanja. Savremeni autori naglašavaju značaj korporativne odgovornosti u poslovanju u pogledu poštovanja ekološke održivosti i etike (Weitzner i dr., 2009), kao i održivog razvoja na mikroekonomskom nivou (Koleva, 2005). Tako, Carroll koristi termine KDO i korporativno građanstvo kao povezane koncepte (Buchholtz i dr., 2009), dok se koncept održivosti i KDO često koriste kao sinonimi (Montiel, 2006).…”

Section: Istorijski Pogled Na Razvoj I Rodno Slepilo Koncepata Korporunclassified

Between commitment and reality: Gender gap in socially responsible franchise companies in the USA and the Republic of Serbia

Djuric-Kuzmanovic¹,

Stanković²

2017

Posl ekonom

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La responsabilité sociale des entreprises dans les pays européens en transition : Réalité et limites

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

The Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Vision of Four Nations

The Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Vision of Four Nations

Oil companies, social responsibility and CSP: combining actions and profiles

Between commitment and reality: Gender gap in socially responsible franchise companies in the USA and the Republic of Serbia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About