1967
DOI: 10.1051/rnd:19670104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LA SIGNIFICATION DU pH DANS LE TUBE DIGESTIF DE GALLUS DOMESTICUS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1E). This closely matches the pH of the chicken's digestive tract (pH 4.5-7.5 (Herpol and van Gembergen, 1967;Faner, 1942;Winget et al, 1962), with the exception of pH 3.5 for the proventriculus (Winget et al, 1962)). Second, a recent and comprehensive re-evaluation of the nature of soluble InsP 6 in biological systems has concluded that the pentamagnesium salt is the most biologicallyrelevant form of InsP 6 (Torres et al, 2005).…”
Section: Expression and Characterization Of Recombinant Avian Minppmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…1E). This closely matches the pH of the chicken's digestive tract (pH 4.5-7.5 (Herpol and van Gembergen, 1967;Faner, 1942;Winget et al, 1962), with the exception of pH 3.5 for the proventriculus (Winget et al, 1962)). Second, a recent and comprehensive re-evaluation of the nature of soluble InsP 6 in biological systems has concluded that the pentamagnesium salt is the most biologicallyrelevant form of InsP 6 (Torres et al, 2005).…”
Section: Expression and Characterization Of Recombinant Avian Minppmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This optimum pH (1.5) was similar despite the pepsin and plant protein source. It is slightly lower than the mean pH (about 2.5 [12,15]) found in the gizzard of broiler chickens fed a commercial feed, or in the stomach of the pig after a meal (between 1.8 and 5.8 [21]). Thus, it seems that in vivo pepsin hydrolysis does not proceed under optimal conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Early experiments showed a direct correlation between quantity and nature of nutrition and the resultant uric acid excretion (Fisher 1935a(Fisher , 1935b. It was also recognised early on that the pH varies throughout the whole intestinal tract of birds (Herpol & van Grembergen 1967). Other studies suggest that for pigeons, neither the volume of food , nor the levels of protein in the diet (McNabb et al 1973) appear to have an influence on the concentration of uric acid in the urine.…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Acidity Of Ex-cretamentioning
confidence: 99%