2000 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference. Conference Record (Cat. No.00TH8540)
DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.2000.904756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Label switched packet transfer for wireless cellular networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as MPLS is concerned, [22] is the first work to propose its use in a wireless environment, i.e. a cellular network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as MPLS is concerned, [22] is the first work to propose its use in a wireless environment, i.e. a cellular network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed protocol builds on the IEEE 802.11 MAC and uses MPLS like labels in the control packets to allow the forwarding node to determine the next hop node while contending for the channel. Jabbari et at [2] have developed the Label Switched Packet Transfer (LSPT), which provides a hierarchical architecture to use label switching to support wireless mobile terminals. This architecture provides efficient packet transfer over mobile wireless networks by efficiently allocating wireless resources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 these IP packets would be encapsulated with two additional IP headers, resulting in a poor efficiency. The use of MPLS in the UTRAN has been considered mainly in terms of protocol functionality, for example: mapping of traffic flows to MPLS Label Switched Paths (LSPs) and signaling for LSP establishment [14], combination of MPLS traffic engineering (MPLS-TE) functions with the Differentiated Services model (DiffServ) [15], and mobility support [16], [17]. These references point out potential advantages of MPLS for transport in the UTRAN, but no numerical results are presented.…”
Section: Alternatives For Transport In the Utranmentioning
confidence: 99%