2011
DOI: 10.2172/1025650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Performance Evaluation of Residential Integrated Heat Pump Water Heaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured standby power of 6.92 W is included in the model. Additionally, a laboratory test of the same model of water heater was carried out to determine the coefficient of performance (COP) as a function of stored water temperature for the heat pump as done by Sparn et al [29]. These data were compared to the TRNSYS heat pump water heater performance map obtained with an average inlet water temperature of 32.2 °C (90 °F), ambient air temperature of 21.7 °C (71 °F), and ambient relative humidity of 40%, which are representative of the conditions seen in operation.…”
Section: Experimental and Computation Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured standby power of 6.92 W is included in the model. Additionally, a laboratory test of the same model of water heater was carried out to determine the coefficient of performance (COP) as a function of stored water temperature for the heat pump as done by Sparn et al [29]. These data were compared to the TRNSYS heat pump water heater performance map obtained with an average inlet water temperature of 32.2 °C (90 °F), ambient air temperature of 21.7 °C (71 °F), and ambient relative humidity of 40%, which are representative of the conditions seen in operation.…”
Section: Experimental and Computation Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the studies investigated the use of the manufacturer's optional duct kits; however, two studies investigated the effect on COP of reduced airflow over the heat pump's evaporation coil. Reducing airflow by blocking onethird of the intake grille caused an insignificant decrease (<1%); a two-thirds blockage caused a decrease on COP values of ~6% to ~2% during the heating cycle (Sparn et al 2011). The effect of ducting the HPWH was expected to be similar to the one-third blocked case due to the grille area blockage of the duct kits and the increased static pressure from the ducts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The performance and side effects of HPWHs are dependent upon a number of variables, such as ambient air temperature, humidity, outgoing draw profile, and incoming water temperature. HPWHs have undergone extensive testing in laboratory settings to quantify their individual performance (Sparn et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations