2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2014.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LABS: Latency aware broadcast scheduling in uncoordinated Duty-Cycled Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the periodic sleeping of every node in duty-cycled WSNs, minimizing delay is one of the most important issues in such networks [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In order to reduce the latency of a data aggregation in duty-cycled WSNs, several approaches have been proposed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the periodic sleeping of every node in duty-cycled WSNs, minimizing delay is one of the most important issues in such networks [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In order to reduce the latency of a data aggregation in duty-cycled WSNs, several approaches have been proposed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a duty-cycled WSN, every sensor node periodically alternates between active and sleeping states. In addition to a reduction of energy consumption, the periodic sleeping of sensor nodes yields a notable increase in communication delay compared with that of always-active networks [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. This is because a sensor node has to wait until its receiver wakes up before transmitting a packet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approximation ratio of VIA is Δ| T | (Δ denotes the maximum out degree of nodes in a network). Another work for the MLBSDC problem achieves a lower broadcast latency compared with one‐to‐all broadcast algorithm. The improvement is attained thanks to a scheduling method for increasing the number of concurrent transmissions within a working period.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed scheme schedules a broadcast with a preference of nodes along the critical paths of a network to minimize the broadcast latency. It worth noting that a node can receive a message only in its active time slot, thus the minimum latency between a sender  and its receiver , later on called latency cost, can be determined by their active time slots [4], as follows:…”
Section: Proposed Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed scheduling scheme is evaluated by the simulation configured similar to the one in [3,4]. All sensor nodes are deployed in a square area of 200m × 200m.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%