2008
DOI: 10.1029/2008gl034354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of correlation between chlorophyll a and cloud droplet effective radius in shallow marine clouds

Abstract: [1] The hypothesis that areas of high oceanic productivity affect the physical properties of shallow marine clouds via the production of secondary organic aerosols is evaluated using satellite data. The correlation between chlorophyll a concentrations, an indication of oceanic productivity, and low cloud droplet liquid phase effective radius (R e ) is examined for several ocean regions and time periods. While a strong correlation between chlorophyll a and low R e can occur for specific periods in some location… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Lana et al [2012] find a remarkably strong negative correlation on a basin-wide scale between cloud effective radius derived from cloud property retrievals using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data [Platnick et al, 2003] and a quantity related to the flux of dimethyl sulfide (DMS), a secondary organic aerosol precursor gas that is emitted to the atmosphere as a by-product of phytoplankton physiology. At a more local scale, Meskhidze and Nenes [2006] correlate MODIS cloud properties with specific plankton blooms in the SO although Miller and Yuter [2008] caution that such correlations found from local studies should be interpreted carefully. Sorooshian et al [2009] examining aircraft data collected near the coast of California conducted such a careful study and found a quantifiable but weak relationship between marine biogenic emissions and cloud properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Lana et al [2012] find a remarkably strong negative correlation on a basin-wide scale between cloud effective radius derived from cloud property retrievals using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data [Platnick et al, 2003] and a quantity related to the flux of dimethyl sulfide (DMS), a secondary organic aerosol precursor gas that is emitted to the atmosphere as a by-product of phytoplankton physiology. At a more local scale, Meskhidze and Nenes [2006] correlate MODIS cloud properties with specific plankton blooms in the SO although Miller and Yuter [2008] caution that such correlations found from local studies should be interpreted carefully. Sorooshian et al [2009] examining aircraft data collected near the coast of California conducted such a careful study and found a quantifiable but weak relationship between marine biogenic emissions and cloud properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electron microscopy observations of marine aerosols depict a variety of heterogeneous particle constructions, with, e.g., organic polymers internally mixed with sulfuric acid or sea salt crystals (Leck and Bigg, 1999. The view that new aerosols and CCN are formed by homogeneous nucleation and further condensation of vapors is too simplistic; H 2 SO 4 nucleation is indeed enhanced by organics and ammonium, and growth to CCN activation occurs by organic condensation (e.g., Hegg et al, 1990;Covert et al, 1992;Kulmala et al, 2004;Zhang et al, 2004;Meskhidze and Nenes, 2006;Metzger et al, 2010). But also tiny primary aerosols get activated as CCN by condensational growth or by absorption of surface active and hygroscopic compounds Leck and Bigg, 2005;O'Dowd and Leeuw, 2007).…”
Section: Uncertainties and Future Research Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies suggest that much of the organic material is water-insoluble when emitted from the ocean , but that SOA of marine origin can also contribute to particle growth (Vaattavorra et al, 2006). Meskhidze and Nenes (2006) suggested that marine isoprene emissions could explain observed correlations between chlorophyll and cloud drop sizes observed by satellite, but a follow-up study (Miller and Yuter, 2008) casts doubt on the correlations. Furthermore, the abundance of atmospheric marine OC is much higher than can be explained in terms of isoprene emissions alone (Spracklen et al, 2008c;Palmer and Shaw, 2005;Arnold et al, 2009), suggesting that primary emissions may dominate (Leck and Bigg, 2007).…”
Section: Marine Organic Primary and Secondary Aerosolmentioning
confidence: 99%