2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2002.07040
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lake Ice Detection from Sentinel-1 SAR with Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This data provides new possibilities for the semipermanent monitoring of ice coverage of large rivers and lakes (Van Leeuwen et al, 2018). Earlier research demonstrated that remote sensing data can be used to detect, classify and monitor ice on sea or on large lakes (Tom et al, 2020;Howell et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021;Lohse et al, 2020;Li et al, 2021). River ice monitoring in Arctic regions has been conducted by several authors: Weber et al (2003) used active data, Altena et al (2021) applied different optical data sets, Goldberg et al (2020) worked with low resolution RS data to predict ice jams, and Zakharova et al (2021) used altimetry to classify river ice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data provides new possibilities for the semipermanent monitoring of ice coverage of large rivers and lakes (Van Leeuwen et al, 2018). Earlier research demonstrated that remote sensing data can be used to detect, classify and monitor ice on sea or on large lakes (Tom et al, 2020;Howell et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021;Lohse et al, 2020;Li et al, 2021). River ice monitoring in Arctic regions has been conducted by several authors: Weber et al (2003) used active data, Altena et al (2021) applied different optical data sets, Goldberg et al (2020) worked with low resolution RS data to predict ice jams, and Zakharova et al (2021) used altimetry to classify river ice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…around 5cm (see Rott et Nagler 1994, Nagler et al 2016, thereby yielding a much lower radar backscatter, which is comparable to open water. Very recently, Tom et al 2020 have used a deep learning approach (DeepLabV3+ Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)) to classify water and ice over three Swiss lakes, using webcam and Sentinel-2 observations to provide a ground truth for the training phase, and for the evaluation of the network's performance. Taking advantage of the spatial correlation of information, a CNN should be able to interpret texture and contextual information with much more complexity than machine learning methods, and improve classification in windy conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, a human operator can, in the vast majority of cases, discriminate between water, land and ice, looking only at the RGB bands. This is why satellite imagery is generally used to provide ground truth for training classifiers using SAR data as done by a human operator in Tom et al 2020. However, because of the aforementioned unreliability of satellite optical data for accurately tracking the lake freeze-up and break-up dates, it has seen much less consideration in literature than SAR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%