Landscape-scale water balance monitoring with an iGrav superconducting gravimeter in a field enclosure

Abstract

Abstract. In spite of the fundamental role of the landscape water balance for the Earth's water and energy cycles, monitoring the water balance and its components beyond the point scale is notoriously difficult due to the multitude of flow and storage processes and their spatial heterogeneity. Here, we present the first field deployment of an iGrav superconducting gravimeter (SG) in a minimized enclosure for long-term integrative monitoring of water storage changes. Results of the field SG on a grassland site under wet–temperate climate conditions were compared to data provided by a nearby SG located in the controlled environment of an observatory building. The field system proves to provide gravity time series that are similarly precise as those of the observatory SG. At the same time, the field SG is more sensitive to hydrological variations than the observatory SG. We demonstrate that the gravity variations observed by the field setup are almost independent of the depth below the terrain surface where water storage changes occur (contrary to SGs in buildings), and thus the field SG system directly observes the total water storage change, i.e., the water balance, in its surroundings in an integrative way. We provide a framework to single out the water balance components actual evapotranspiration and lateral subsurface discharge from the gravity time series on annual to daily timescales. With about 99 and 85 % of the gravity signal due to local water storage changes originating within a radius of 4000 and 200 m around the instrument, respectively, this setup paves the road towards gravimetry as a continuous hydrological field-monitoring technique at the landscape scale.

Developing observational methods to drive future hydrological science: Can we make a start as a community?

“…This technological mission is necessarily long term because it does not seem that significant improvements to existing methods are yet on the horizon. There have been some improvements in radar and microwave rainfall estimates (Diederich, Ryzhkov, Simmer, Zhang, & Trömel, ; Rico‐Ramirez, Liguori, & Schellart, ); eddy correlation and remote sensing estimates of evapotranspiration (Franssen, Stöckli, Lehner, Rotenberg, & Seneviratne, ; Maes, Gentine, Verhoest, & Gonzalez Miralles, ); gravity anomaly estimates of storage (Güntner et al, ; Huang et al, ; Richey et al, ), acoustic Doppler measurements of discharge (Farina, Alvisi, & Franchini, ; Moore, Jamieson, Rainville, Rennie, & Mueller, ), and “citizen science” methods of getting more spatially distributed observations (e.g., Le Coz et al, ; Paul et al, ; Starkey et al, ). Significant epistemic uncertainties and some unmeasured states remain for all of these technologies.…”

Monitoring Saturation Changes with Ambient Seismic Noise and Gravimetry in a Karst Environment

“…Various geophysical methods are already used for hydrological modeling, but they all have limitations that seismic monitoring may circumnavigate because it is an integrative method on a defined depth range depending on the frequency. Gravimetry has been used in recent studies on heterogeneous media, in different contexts, because it directly measures water content variation at a large scale, averaging small heterogeneities (Jacob et al, 2008; Pfeffer et al, 2013; Fores et al, 2017a; Güntner et al, 2017). Gravimetry is also useful for focused infiltration (e.g., Kennedy et al 2014), but one drawback of this averaging property is that gravimetry lacks depth resolution for one‐dimensional infiltration.…”

Continuous gravity observation with a superconducting gravimeter at the Tomakomai CCS demonstration site, Japan: applicability to ground‐based monitoring of offshore CO2 geological storage

“…The SG and its peripheral devices were housed in a metallic enclosure, called a 'field enclosure' , to protect them from damage by environmental phenomena such as precipitation, strong and corrosive salty wind, air temperature change, and corrosive sea spray. [25][26][27][28] The SG and the field enclosure were mounted separately on a 0.8-m thick reinforced concrete block constructed 0.6 m below the ground surface. Below the concrete block, four 500-mm-diameter cylindrical concrete pillars were constructed at 6.5-m depth from the bottom of the block, where the ground was sufficiently hard.…”