2009
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.80.061102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Langevin equation approach to diffusion magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: The normal phase diffusion problem in magnetic resonance imaging ͑MRI͒ is treated by means of the Langevin equation for the phase variable using only the properties of the characteristic function of Gaussian random variables. The calculation may be simply extended to anomalous diffusion using a fractional generalization of the Langevin equation proposed by Lutz ͓E. Lutz, Phys. Rev. E 64, 051106 ͑2001͔͒ pertaining to the fractional Brownian motion of a free particle coupled to a fractal heat bath. The results c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
43
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have obtained a very good agreement with these measurements but, since in [12] an erroneous formula for S (t) was used (see [3]), the parameters ε and the generalized diffusion coefficient D ε = k B T/γ ε extracted from the experiments are very different. For example, instead of ε = 0.31 determined in [12] (Table 1), the best correspondence with the measurements is obtained for ε about 0.42.…”
Section: Harmonically Bounded Particle Described By the Fractional Lesupporting
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We have obtained a very good agreement with these measurements but, since in [12] an erroneous formula for S (t) was used (see [3]), the parameters ε and the generalized diffusion coefficient D ε = k B T/γ ε extracted from the experiments are very different. For example, instead of ε = 0.31 determined in [12] (Table 1), the best correspondence with the measurements is obtained for ε about 0.42.…”
Section: Harmonically Bounded Particle Described By the Fractional Lesupporting
confidence: 54%
“…We have obtained a very good agreement with these measurements but, since in [12] an erroneous formula for S (t) was used (see [3]), the parameters ε and the generalized diffusion coefficient D ε = k B T/γ ε extracted from the experiments are very different. For example, instead of ε = 0.31 determined in [12] (Table 1), the best correspondence with the measurements is obtained for ε about 0.42. Even if ε was correctly extracted from the experiments, D ε found in [12] would have to be divided by 2(2 1−ε − 1)/(2 − ε), which, for ε ∈ [0, 1] changes from 0 to 1 (e.g., if ε = 0.5, see Table II [12], D ε should be about 1.8 times larger).…”
Section: Harmonically Bounded Particle Described By the Fractional Lesupporting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations