1968
DOI: 10.2307/411489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Loyalty in the United States: The Maintenance and Perpetuation of Non-English Mother Tongues by American Ethnic and Religious Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fishman delved into "language loyalty" among immigrants in the US, exploring how ethnic and religious groups preserved their non-English mother tongues amidst assimilation pressures. Language became a symbol of ethnic identity and solidarity, preserving cultural heritage within immigrant communities [1]. Giles and Johnson introduced "ethnolinguistic vitality," studying how language perception influenced intergroup communication and social cohesion among immigrants and host communities [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fishman delved into "language loyalty" among immigrants in the US, exploring how ethnic and religious groups preserved their non-English mother tongues amidst assimilation pressures. Language became a symbol of ethnic identity and solidarity, preserving cultural heritage within immigrant communities [1]. Giles and Johnson introduced "ethnolinguistic vitality," studying how language perception influenced intergroup communication and social cohesion among immigrants and host communities [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While our analysis of the two campaigns mentioned above cannot ignore the technological aspects of social media-ultimately, they enable connectivity-an examination of the social and culturally authentic aspects of (language) identity, as well as the resulting metrics, may uncover reasons for the differing levels of success. After all, a language is unlikely to be maintained without an engaged community (Fishman et al, 1966). And while traditional media may lend a sense of community to the groups that they address (Cormack, 2007, p. 54), how that sense is produced and reproduced on social media relies on the practices of users who affiliate in co-constructed chronotopes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%