2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.07.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laplacian regularized locality-constrained coding for image classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spatial pyramid matching sparse coding (SCSPM), authors [14] developed an extension of the SPM method, by generalising VQ to SC. In Laplacian regularised locality‐constrained coding [15], the dependency between local features was also considered, which improved classification accuracy. In LLC on the basis of histogram intersection, authors [16] use histogram intersection to describe the distance between dictionary and feature, achieving more robust codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spatial pyramid matching sparse coding (SCSPM), authors [14] developed an extension of the SPM method, by generalising VQ to SC. In Laplacian regularised locality‐constrained coding [15], the dependency between local features was also considered, which improved classification accuracy. In LLC on the basis of histogram intersection, authors [16] use histogram intersection to describe the distance between dictionary and feature, achieving more robust codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dong et al [20] proposed an orthonormal DL method by exerting an orthonormal constraint on the learned dictionary to enforce the dictionary atoms to be as dissimilar as possible. Min et al [21] constructed a Laplacian regularized locality-constrained coding (LapLLC) algorithm for image classification, in which the similarity matrix is defined on the training data. To fully exploit the locality and label information of the learned dictionary, Li et al [22] constructed a locality-constrained and label embedding dictionary learning (LCLE-DL) algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such an approach cannot obtain a robust dictionary with which the coding coefficients of the target patches can be used as features to reliably distinguish the target from the background [13]. Data locality has also been observed as a key issue in clustering, dimensionality reduction [14], density estimation [15], and image classification [16], [17]. While sparse coding has been widely used for addressing image classification; whether sparsity alone is sufficient or even necessary for solving such tasks has been systematically investigated in [18], [19], [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%