19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference 2013
DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-2137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Eddy Simulation for Jet Installation Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22b, we shows the same jet at locations further away, y This explanation is consistent with numerical simulations. The predictions of Paliath & Premasuthan [52], for the same cases that we use in this paper were based on numerical simulations using LES and Ffowcs-- [18] found that in the absence of any linear/non--linear interaction, the predicted polar directivity is cardioid shaped at low frequencies. Any departure from the cardioid symmetry in the directivity pattern then appears in either as asymmetry (about the jet centerline for the polar directivity) or in the appearance of multiple lobes.…”
Section: Applicability Of Rdt Modelmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22b, we shows the same jet at locations further away, y This explanation is consistent with numerical simulations. The predictions of Paliath & Premasuthan [52], for the same cases that we use in this paper were based on numerical simulations using LES and Ffowcs-- [18] found that in the absence of any linear/non--linear interaction, the predicted polar directivity is cardioid shaped at low frequencies. Any departure from the cardioid symmetry in the directivity pattern then appears in either as asymmetry (about the jet centerline for the polar directivity) or in the appearance of multiple lobes.…”
Section: Applicability Of Rdt Modelmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Other efforts have focused more on aerofoil applications [48] using Goldstein's (1978) RDT theory [22] to model high frequency noise at low Mach numbers. There have also been a number of numerical studies (Wolf et al [49], Cheung et al [50] and Venugopal et al [51]) in which Large--Eddy simulations were used to predict aerofoil noise and jet--surface interaction with a rectangular jet and flat plate [52].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GE Aviation has developed a similar LES based approach (Paliath et al, 2011) to accurately predict the acoustic signature from complex exhaust nozzles and noise control devices such as dual stream and chevron nozzles an example of which can be found in Figure 5. GE Aviation has also extended the predictive capability to canonical jet-installed configurations (Paliath et al, 2013) shown in Figure 5. It is essential to be able to predict and understand the altering of the noise source generation and propagation mechanisms in the presence of forward flight and installation geometries like pylon, wing and flap.…”
Section: Ii1 Exhaust Jet Noisementioning
confidence: 98%
“…A second order kinetic energy preserving (KEP) discretisation [24] is used in space with numerical smoothing adapted for jet simulations. The KEP inviscid cell face flux with additional numerical smoothing is given below by equation (6).…”
Section: Discretisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For complex geometries the optimum FWH surface placement is not clear a priori. Paliath and Premasuthan [6] use a simplified surface that encompasses the entire geometry at a nearly uniform distance. Another method is to base the FWH surface on an iso-surface of mean turbulence kinetic energy [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%