2009
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large eddy simulation using high-resolution and high-order methods

Abstract: Restrictions on computing power make direct numerical simulation too expensive for complex flows; thus, the development of accurate large eddy simulation (LES) methods, which are industrially applicable and efficient, is required. This paper reviews recent findings about the leading order dissipation rate associated with high-resolution methods and improvements to the standard schemes for use in highly turbulent flows. Results from implicit LES are presented for a broad range of flows and numerical schemes, ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
95
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High resolution is achieved by the Monotonic Upstream-Centered Scheme for Conservation Laws (MUSCL) scheme in its Total Variation Diminishing form (Van Leer 1977) in conjunction with the fifth-order accurate limiter (Kim and Kim 2005) and low-Mach corrections (Thornber et al 2008). The fifth-order version of the MUSCL scheme has been found to provide accurate results for a broad range of flows (Drikakis et al 2009). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High resolution is achieved by the Monotonic Upstream-Centered Scheme for Conservation Laws (MUSCL) scheme in its Total Variation Diminishing form (Van Leer 1977) in conjunction with the fifth-order accurate limiter (Kim and Kim 2005) and low-Mach corrections (Thornber et al 2008). The fifth-order version of the MUSCL scheme has been found to provide accurate results for a broad range of flows (Drikakis et al 2009). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mach number for the left and right states are calculated based on the velocity magnitude of all the velocity components independent of the normal direction in which the flux is computed. This modification is different in nature from a preconditioning step used for changing the flow variables, since our main motivation is not to relax the restriction in terms of the time-step size, but rather to increase the resolution at low speed regions, where this modification has demonstrated increased resolution and accuracy for a wide-range of flow problems [1,2,32,33,54], can be utilised with any Riemann solver and without computational overheads.…”
Section: Low-mach Number Treatment Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more compact technique with considerable smaller computational overhead was proposed by Thornber et al. [32] for block-structured grids and was investigated for a broad range of flows in [2]. The method was also employed in conjunction with implicit time-stepping in [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason for employing the MUSCL third-order scheme in the in-house code is to be consistent with the FLUENT solver in terms of the order of accuracy. For improving the accuracy of the time-integration, a second-order strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta scheme [22,23] has been employed. In the simulation setup, the box of edge length 2π is considered as the geometry for the problem as shown in Figure 1 where the outer domain…”
Section: Numerical Model and Flow Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%