2021
DOI: 10.1002/elan.202100425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser‐induced Graphene in Facts, Numbers, and Notes in View of Electroanalytical Applications: A Review

Abstract: In this review, laser-induced graphene (LIG) -based electrodes are discussed by covering such essential areas, as a characterization of LIG material properties necessary for electroanalysis, including data on LIG sheet resistance, wettability, spatial resolution, electrochemical characteristics, as well as correlations of "process" -"properties" -"electroanalytical characteristics"of LIGelectrodes. Moreover, typical and innovative LIG-based electrodes designs for electroanalytical applications, including combi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(171 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low peak potential separations were achieved, below 200 mV for all the tested scan rates, showing very good electron transfer capabilities of the electrode surface. Applying the Nicholson method , for the determination of the heterogeneous electron transfer (HET) rate constant k 0 (Figure S6), an estimated value of 1.03 × 10 –2 cm·s –1 (23.9% RSD, n = 5) was reached, which improves on previous reports from paper-based LIG electrochemical sensors , and is of the same order of magnitude for LIG synthesized on polymeric substrates . Another important aspect analyzed using the Randles–Sevcik equation was the electrochemical surface area (Figure S6), which reached a value of 13.7 mm 2 (16.9% RSD), an increase compared to the 8 mm 2 geometric area of the WE.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Low peak potential separations were achieved, below 200 mV for all the tested scan rates, showing very good electron transfer capabilities of the electrode surface. Applying the Nicholson method , for the determination of the heterogeneous electron transfer (HET) rate constant k 0 (Figure S6), an estimated value of 1.03 × 10 –2 cm·s –1 (23.9% RSD, n = 5) was reached, which improves on previous reports from paper-based LIG electrochemical sensors , and is of the same order of magnitude for LIG synthesized on polymeric substrates . Another important aspect analyzed using the Randles–Sevcik equation was the electrochemical surface area (Figure S6), which reached a value of 13.7 mm 2 (16.9% RSD), an increase compared to the 8 mm 2 geometric area of the WE.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Applying the Nicholson method 47 , 48 for the determination of the heterogeneous electron transfer (HET) rate constant k 0 ( Figure S6 ), an estimated value of 1.03 × 10 –2 cm·s –1 (23.9% RSD, n = 5) was reached, which improves on previous reports from paper-based LIG electrochemical sensors 49 , 50 and is of the same order of magnitude for LIG synthesized on polymeric substrates. 51 Another important aspect analyzed using the Randles–Sevcik equation was the electrochemical surface area ( Figure S6 ), which reached a value of 13.7 mm 2 (16.9% RSD), an increase compared to the 8 mm 2 geometric area of the WE. This indicates that even with the difference in surface chemistry of transferred LIG patterns previously studied, the surface morphology and chemistry allow for an efficient filling of the porous structure by aqueous electrolytes and diffusion of redox species, for effective electron transfer.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrode deposited at 1.0 V has the lowest features and subsequently the lowest surface activity among the electrodes. The electrode deposited at 5.0 V has the highest particle growth, but the highest agglomeration in it has a possibly negative effect and further results in the increase of the redox potentials in comparison to that of the electrodes deposited at 3.0 and 4.0 V. Moreover, the Randles–Sevcik equation shows that the peak current value of the CV curve is in direct proportion with the effective active surface area of the electrode, and if all other parameters are kept constant, the peak current value will only be governed by the electrode’s effective active surface area . Here, Figure clearly shows that the electrode fabricated at 3.0 V has a maximum peak current value and consequently the highest electrochemical activity and is hence used for H 2 O 2 sensing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 43 However, there is no reliable explanation for the different surface values estimated from the electroactive area and nitrogen adsorption. 44 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%