On the basis of experimental data, the aim of complete local tumor control (R0 ablation) can only be obtained if additional energy is applied after reaching the tumor-adapted maximal coagulation volume. Analogous to the oncological safety margin in surgical resection, we defined this decisive energy difference as the "energy safety margin" for in situ ablation. The energy safety margin is the energy that must be additionally applied after reaching the plateau in the energy/volume curve to achieve complete tumor coagulation. In addition to that, in situ ablation should be combined with temporary interruption of hepatic perfusion whenever possible to prevent intralesional recurrences. In this way, the thermoprotective mechanism of hepatic perfusion can be effectively eliminated. With restrictions, the survival data after ablation in specialized centers is comparable to surgical resection with concomitantly lower morbidity and mortality. Based on recent findings and with the corresponding expertise in the field of ablation and state-of-the-art equipment, ablation is, thus, an alternative to surgical resection. The combined application of surgical resection and ablation is also a suitable method for increasing the R0 rate and thus helps improve the prognosis of treated patients. In summary, it can be said that in situ ablation is a useful expansion of the therapeutic spectrum of liver metastases and can be applied as an alternative to or in combination with surgical resection.