In this study, we present a novel mechanism for NO loss from nitroalkyl radicals that circumvents the traditional higher-energy nitro−nitrite isomerization. We characterize the intrinsic reaction coordinate at the B3LYP/6-311++g(3df,2p) level of theory and calculate the transition-state energies using the G4 composite method; the subsequent dynamics en route to the highly exothermic NO + acetone product channel proceeds through a three-membered ring intermediate. Crossed laser-molecular beam scattering experiments on the 2-nitro-2-propyl radical confirm the importance of this new mechanism in determining the product branching.SECTION: Molecular Structure, Quantum Chemistry, and General Theory T he decomposition mechanisms of nitroalkanes have been studied experimentally and theoretically for decades because of their relevance to a wide variety of chemistry ranging from atmospheric mechanisms to energetic materials. Nitroalkanes can undergo numerous dissociation events, but two of the most studied are NO 2 loss and NO loss. Loss of NO 2 tends to arise from simple C−N bond fission, but the production of NO is not as intuitive. The accepted mechanism for NO loss in nitroalkanes (and other nitroalkyl species) is isomerization to a nitrite intermediate followed by O−N bond cleavage; the energetic barrier to this isomerization also tends to be comparable to but higher than C−NO 2 fission. Interestingly, the local geometry (at the C−NO 2 group) of the nitro−nitrite isomerization transition state (TS) is very similar for a series of nitroalkanes, 1−6 2-nitropropene, 7 and nitroaromatics.8 Early calculations on the nitro−nitrite isomerization TS in nitromethane were done by Dewar et al.1 in 1985. Recently, high-level calculations on this TS in nitromethane are reported in refs 2 and 3 along with high-level energy calculations from previous work. The calculated TSs for nitroalkanes, all on neutral singlet species, all have relatively long (∼1.8−2.2 Å) C−O and C−N bonds; at the TS, these two bonds are usually close to equal lengths. The barrier energies for these TSs are calculated at 62.1 kcal/mol for 2-nitropropane, 64.0 kcal/mol for nitroethane (this value was originally reported in ref 5 at 60.7 kcal/mol but recalculated at a higher level of theory), and 67−70 kcal/mol for nitromethane. In all of these compounds, simple C−NO 2 bond fission remains at ∼60 kcal/mol and tends to be lower than, or almost equal to, the barrier for nitro−nitrite isomerization. The nitro−nitrite barrier lowers in energy as the number of methyl groups bonded to the C−NO 2 increases. For example, in 2-nitropropane, these two barriers are almost equal (within ∼1.5 kcal/mol), but in nitromethane, the isomerization is much higher (∼10 kcal/mol). Although there are many different calculations for this isomerization in nitroalkanes, there are few calculations done specifically on the corresponding nitroalkyl radical species.In this study, we demonstrate that the introduction of a radical at the nitroalkyl center unfolds a second mechanism ...