2017
DOI: 10.3390/en10122070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latching and Declutching Control of the Solo Duck Wave-Energy Converter with Different Load Types

Abstract: Abstract:The solo duck wave-energy converter (WEC) captures power in a point absorber manner, hence it exhibits high power-capture efficiency within only a narrow bandwidth. Passive control is characterized by a unidirectional power flow, and thus its engineering implementation can be simplified. In this paper, two typical passive control strategies, latching and declutching control, are applied to the solo duck WEC to improve its power-capture performance at wave periods larger and smaller than the natural pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Active controls differs from passive controls. In active control, power has to be supplied either externally from the produced power by the WEC for controlling the primary wave energy absorber [103,104], while latching and declutching are examples of the passive control methods of a WEC, and are very common in WEC optimization studies [105,106]. Latching control is achieved by holding the heaving WEC in a fixed position when the velocity is zero and releasing the WEC at the right time so that its velocity can be in phase with the excitation force, so that resonance is achieved [107].…”
Section: Active and Passive Control To Increase Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active controls differs from passive controls. In active control, power has to be supplied either externally from the produced power by the WEC for controlling the primary wave energy absorber [103,104], while latching and declutching are examples of the passive control methods of a WEC, and are very common in WEC optimization studies [105,106]. Latching control is achieved by holding the heaving WEC in a fixed position when the velocity is zero and releasing the WEC at the right time so that its velocity can be in phase with the excitation force, so that resonance is achieved [107].…”
Section: Active and Passive Control To Increase Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Derivative-free optimization was used by Feng and Kerrigan [35] to determine the ideal latching duration for a heaving buoy WEC. A golden-section search algorithm was recently used by Wu et al [36] to numerically search for the ideal latching duration for a solitary duck WEC with various load types. They also explored the performance enhancement brought on by the latching control and its real-time implementation [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to capture considerable power outside the resonance frequency band, different optimization methods have been proposed and investigated. Some optimization methods include changes made to the shape and dimensions of the buoy [30], while latching and declutching methods [31] are also used in some existing studies. Latching control is achieved by holding the heaving WEC in a fixed position when the velocity is zero and releasing it at the right time so that its velocity can be in phase with the excitation force to achieve resonance [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Latching control is achieved by holding the heaving WEC in a fixed position when the velocity is zero and releasing it at the right time so that its velocity can be in phase with the excitation force to achieve resonance [32]. On the other hand, declutching works by alternatively switching the power take off system on and off [31]. Another method is the model predictive control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%