“… 5-6 | Low footprint, good biomass retention for increased organic removal, extra disinfection to avoid health risks, compliance with water standards | An additional cost of chlorination apart from the challenges mentioned for membrane bioreactors | [ 155 ] | Integrated fixed-film activated sludge | 0.03 | - | COD = 92.52%, LAS = 94.24%, Oil and grease = 90.07% | - | Higher resistance to organic and hydraulic loading than conventional activated sludge | High construction and maintenance cost, expert knowledge required, high energy consumption due to aeration | [ 157 ] |
Aerobic fluidized bed reactor | 0.14 | - | COD = 73%, Anionic surfactant = 57%, TN = 42%, TSS = 66%, DOC = 52% | - | Excellent mixing and high mass transfer for good biodegradation, fluidized materials accommodate microbial growth | Expert knowledge is required for maintenance and operation. | [ 158 ] |
Moving bed biofilm reactor + UV disinfection | 1 | 2.4 | COD = 93%, BOD 5 = 97%, | - | Higher biomass concentration, higher organic removal, lower hydraulic residence times, sound mixing and mass transfer, and disinfection ensure microorganisms removal | Manual monitoring is required. Insects are attracted to biofilm reactors. |
…”