2013
DOI: 10.1080/09695958.2012.752150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lawyers' perspectives on ‘what is court-connected mediation for?’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…101 This view is supported by Rundell's research into court connected mediation in the Supreme Court of Tasmania finding that lawyers often held a preference for pursuing outcomes based on legal norms. 102 It has also been found that lawyers may adversely influence the ability of parties in mediation to reconcile with each other. 103 The potential for affording greater prominence to the role of lawyers is especially troubling in the context of international commercial disputes.…”
Section: The Further Juridification Of Mediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…101 This view is supported by Rundell's research into court connected mediation in the Supreme Court of Tasmania finding that lawyers often held a preference for pursuing outcomes based on legal norms. 102 It has also been found that lawyers may adversely influence the ability of parties in mediation to reconcile with each other. 103 The potential for affording greater prominence to the role of lawyers is especially troubling in the context of international commercial disputes.…”
Section: The Further Juridification Of Mediationmentioning
confidence: 99%