2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.08.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Layers of protection analysis in the framework of possibility theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in paper [2], it was generalized that the SIL is based on the probability-relying data. Research results [3] expand the previous statement on the fact that probabilistic data bring…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in paper [2], it was generalized that the SIL is based on the probability-relying data. Research results [3] expand the previous statement on the fact that probabilistic data bring…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It is similarly possible to apply the ETA methods [24]. Taking into consideration that the concept of SIL is based on probabilistic data [2] with a certain share of uncertainty [3], the regulated methods are used to determine the risk [15][16][17][18]. However, qualitative indices are analyzed in this case [6].…”
Section: Fig 4 Input Of Ndmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate the applicability of the proposed fuzzy risk graph model when dealing with uncertainty characterizing parameters data, our case study focuses on one of the most sensitive systems, which may generate, in the event of failure, catastrophic, human, material, and environmental consequences. It is the heater (H101), which is the key equipment of gas treatment plantMPP3 of SONATRACH Company (Algeria) (Ouazraoui et al, 2013). The main function of the heater (H101) is to produce light fuel gases (commercial gas) that are essentially composed of methane and ethane.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in addition to the subjective outcomes involving hypotheses and experts' judgments in the risk assessment process (Abrahamsson, 2002;Kumar et al, 2005). In the case of safety instrumented systems (SIS), which are considered highly reliable protection layers, and whose performance is quantified by their safety integrity level (SIL), the data referring to the probability of their deficiencies are affected by uncertainty as they are linked to rare events (Marszal and Scharpf, 2001;Markowski et al, 2007;Sallak, 2007;Simon et al, 2007;Nait-Said et al, 2009;Ouazraoui et al, 2013Ouazraoui et al, , 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of SB's performances using the LOPA and TRAM methods Calculations required by the LOPA method (Ouazraoui et al, 2013;CCPS, 2001). For each "i" sequence, leading to an accidental event (BLEVE, for example), its occurrence frequency (F c ) is obtained by multiplying the frequency of initiator event ðf I i Þ and the average probabilities of failure on demand PFD ij of each layer of protection:…”
Section: Evaluation Of Safety Barriers Performancementioning
confidence: 99%